Bossa
Established Member
I just dont understand why we need three frigging wingers.
Bossa said:I'd rather move for Mata or Nzogbia than Alvarez. I like Alvarez but I think that he's a little bit raw and there's a risk that he needs to acclimatise after just moving from Argentina.
Mata would cost 10m more but at least you know what you get. I think that we need a 20m player more than two 10m players.
Bossa said:I just dont understand why we need three frigging wingers.
Anzac said:spartandre217 said:fabo said:Come on man, stop being obtuse for the sake of it.
He's saying that the midfield malfunctions when certain players are unavailable, and Wenger perseveres with the same shape/roles regardless. The best example being Cesc's injuries and the failure of numerous people to fill that void in the AM role.
Although I think the wide players are as much to blame for that as the unsuitability of Nasri/Ramsey/Rosicky to play Cesc's role(that's another discussion). I doubt many, if any, midfielders in world football could do Cesc's job to the level he does.
I really wasn't being obtuse though. :shock:
Sure the AM position isn't as effective when Cesc is out but he DOES alter the position so that most forward midfielder plays DEEPER when Cesc is out to get on the ball more and give them more time to do their thing. See Ramsey vs Utd for more detail.
Which was about the ONLY time we saw the midfield work as an inverted shape as opposed to 3 distinct roles.
spartandre217 said:Anzac said:Which was about the ONLY time we saw the midfield work as an inverted shape as opposed to 3 distinct roles.
City and Chelsea were surely one-offs too huh. First half vs Newcastle? Tottenham? Surely those didn't happen either.
spartandre217 said:Do you disagree that our midfield is the most talented and efficient in the country?
ricky1985 said:I'd take the three big rumours of the last few days; Cahill, Vidal and Mata. Yes please, thank you very much.