Armor for Sleep
Established Member
You're right, Buffon is getting a bit old isn't he? :wink:
Vela said:I really don't understand why so many people want Gonalons? He seems average to me. Most clubs in France have a defensive midfielder who we get linked with and they wouldn't improve us, e.g. M'Vila, Capoue etc. Matuidi would be a great signing but he's not going to leave PSG.
Vela said:Arteta is a better player than Gonalons. If we signed Gonalons he wouldn't start ahead of Arteta and Ramsey/Wilshere in the deeper midfield roles.
Arteta and Ramsey have been crucial to the good run Arsenal have been on. There midfield partnership reminds me of Bayern's midfield of Schweinsteiger and Martinez. With Arteta playing the same role Schweinsteiger does as the deepest midfield. And Ramsey playing the role Martinez does, as the box-to-box middfielder a bit further forward to press the opposition.
With Diaby out injured and it looks like Coquelin will leave in the summer. We should try and bring in a box-to-box midfielder IMO.
Vela said:But if you don't want Wilshere to play in one of the deeper midfield roles then where is he going to play for us next season? He can't play the number ten role because he isn't ready to play there IMO and needs to improve his final ball. He's capable of playing in the deeper midfield roles like he did for us in the 2010/11 season and his midfield partner then was Alex Song. Which he showed that season he is good enough defensively to play there.
I don't see how signing Gonalons would improve us. He just seems the typical average French defensive midfielder we get linked with every single week.
How many teams actually play with a defensive midfielder know a days? I can't see AW signing one this summer I think it will be a box-to-box midfielder. Who was the last defensive midfielder AW signed, Gilberto? Not counting Lass Diarra.
Anzac said:IMO A DLP does not balance with a B2B, more so when the DLP is primarily a creative player who relies upon positioning to defend rather than having any physical presence or ability to win the ball. IMO ALL of our CLP & B2B options are light weight attacking/creative players and NONE offer genuine defence, physical presence or ball winning ability.
Hence why we again compromised our attack in order to place another body in midfield for the run home in the 451,
yet in doing so our attack options are not suited to playing the revised roles as WF or CF in the 451.
I find it staggering that we are looking for solutions to maintain a system and roles that are fundamentally the result of compromises for RVP as lone ST and Fabregas as AMC - neither of whom are still at the club.
For mind our best shape & system post 2007-08 was the hybrid 4213 - a playmaker playing out of midfield in support of 3 genuine forwards, and 2 physical holding CMs to anchor the midfield and cover the flanks.
We have VERY direct forward options available for the 3,
and in both Cazorla & Arteta we have players more than capable of the playmaker role from midfield.
What we lack are the CMs to anchor the midfield and cover the flanks.
As such this is the weakest midfield in AW's tenure.
Vela said:I really don't understand why so many people want Gonalons? He seems average to me. Most clubs in France have a defensive midfielder who we get linked with and they wouldn't improve us, e.g. M'Vila, Capoue etc. Matuidi would be a great signing but he's not going to leave PSG.