• ! ! ! IMPORTANT MESSAGE ! ! !

    Discussions about police investigations


    In light of recent developments about a player from Premier League being arrested and until there is an official announcement, ALL users should refrain from discussing or speculating about situations around personal off-pitch matters related to any Arsenal player. This is to protect you and the forum.

    Users who disregard this reminder will be issued warnings and their posts will get deleted from public.

They are called Referees

Are you for VAR or not?


  • Total voters
    125

Yousif Arsenal

On Vinai's payroll & misses 4th place trophy 🏆
Trusted ⭐
Basically they just didn't have best of angles and stick with Atwell decision on field. Also why they stop it when Willock touched the ball the ball was few more inches out before willock touch it
 

Iwobeast

Well-Known Member

Country: Netherlands

Player:Martinelli
I don't get the decision regarding the foul, there is no push but Gabriel just magically flies forward? lol

He'd be able to head the ball away and prevent a goal, how is that not a foul?
 

Synical

Well-Known Member

Country: England
I don't get the decision regarding the foul, there is no push but Gabriel just magically flies forward? lol

He'd be able to head the ball away and prevent a goal, how is that not a foul?
Exactly. Why would he go down when he could try to defend the goal instead, FFS?
 

avenellroad

John Radford’s son
It’s all just a clear agenda against Arsenal. They are doubling down now even further after Arteta’s comments in the press.

If Arteta hadn’t come out with those comments, I’m willing to wager that they would have admitted that VAR ****ed up.
 

Penn_

Established Member
Trusted ⭐
Reverse the situation Joelinton is about to tap into an open net, only for Gabriel to shove him away, Saliba then clears. Are they saying that wouldn't be penalty worthy?

It's suspcious because VAR have every angle broadcaster do, why are they putting out the clips where Gabriel's fall does look a little odd?

Clear as day here - GIL_2023-11-04-14-56-59
 

Tir Na Nog

Changes Opinion Every 5 Minutes

Country: Ireland
So no handball because the goal scorer didn’t handball it????

****en clowns.

In fairness that rule has been in place for a while, can only rule it out if the goalscorer handles. That onus would've been on the referee to spot the handball and call it.
 

Macho

CEO of Rustlers burgers.
Dusted 🔻

Country: England
It's so the Arsenal supporters that suffer under the Battered Women Syndrome have something to justify and accept their decades long abuse with. Looks like it is working for some A-M posters. Sad and pathetic if you ask me...


It’s entertaining watching your show your ass more and more as the days go by :lol:

Likening dodgy ref decisions to an outdated term for ptsd caused by domestic abuse, when the irony is you’re the biggest victim here crying about it.

If Arsenal played better then the ref or VAR isn’t discussed.
 

CaseUteinberger

Established Member

Country: Sweden
It’s entertaining watching your show your ass more and more as the days go by :lol:
:lol: I have made this comment before and I am sure you felt it applied to you then as well as now. Make of it what you want.

Me, personally, I don't believe anything coming from the PL referees and the PGMOL. It is all self-serving BS to hide their anti-Arsenal bias if you ask me.
 

Blankety Blank

emoji merchant
It's like something from Monty Python's Flying Circus.
It's not funny though is it!!🤔
Tbf I can understand they can't say the ball was out & I also get they can't give an offside if they haven't got the tech.

However it looks like a handball & a foul/push.

I guess if I am being magnanimous there is no clear & obvious error so they don't intervene.

4 decisions all went for Saudi Toon.
 

Bucephalus

Active Member
:lol: I have made this comment before and I am sure you felt it applied to you then as well as now. Make of it what you want.

Me, personally, I don't believe anything coming from the PL referees and the PGMOL. It is all self-serving BS to hide their anti-Arsenal bias if you ask me.
I don't believe there's an anti-Arsenal bias. That would ascribe to them a competency and consistency they just don't have. It's really just incompetency covering up for incompetency all the way down.

Otherwise known as Hanlon's razor: "never ascribe to malice that which can equally be explained by stupidity".
 

jake

Member
In fairness that rule has been in place for a while, can only rule it out if the goalscorer handles. That onus would've been on the referee to spot the handball and call it.

The handball role for the goalscorer role is for every handball. Not just unnatural position etc. Think of Hallands goal where he stoped the ball from going over the goalline when he falled over in the chelsea game. For me that was a handball but the video was so bad so hard to see and no goal, but the rule is absurd and they proberbly saved their face by doing a quick check. (Most likely even arsenal would have had that goal). In this case it hit his arms that are outstreched in front of him. That is no natural position….. clear handball
 
Top Bottom