Apologies for saying you're talking rubbish, you aren't.Thank you for the response. Apologies if you thought I was talking rubbish
In my opinion you can take a view in whether the refereeing decisions incorrectly affected the outcome, but it's all theoretical. What's actually important is how we respond to the poor refereeing calls
On your first point, it seems like you've grouped our last two performances together. In my opinion our last two performances are the complete opposites of each other. I actually think Emery did a good job setting the team up against Sp**s. As you correctly pointed out, we suffered from some bad refereeing calls. However we kept playing our game and created some good chances, and it isn't unreasonable to say that we probably would have won if those mistakes been made refereeing hadn't.
The difference with the Sp**s game and the Rennes game is that team didn't let the bad decisions affect their mentality and drop their heads, and we have to give Emery and the players credit for that.
With Rennes however, Sokratis supposedly got a soft red card (although I've heard that he had a another challenge or two go unfinished prior to the second yellow). We can't do anything about that. Refereeing decisions are completely out of our control and nothing we can do or say can change a decision that's been made. But given that a red card was given, we should have adapted so much better to it. You said that blaming Emery was very nitpicky but I respectfully disagree. I think there was so much more he could have done to help the team deal with.
We had mhikitaryan playing at right back, we had Özil wandering around in a game were we needed more depth to our midfield, we had Monreal exposed and beaten by their attack constantly.
We had our players recklessly overcommitting to try and score and an unnecessary goal. Even after we conceded our third goal we overcommitted in attack and risked conceding a fourth in the exact same fashion as we conceded the forth. We should have managed the game so much better and Emery should have adapted to the situation he was in much better than he did.
I'm sorry but to say that Emery wasn't at fault is just not true. Emery is the manager and ultimately responsible for the performance that is delivered on the pitch. Its up to him to give instructions to the players, and it's up to him to ensure they follow those instructions. If he can't do that then it isn't the players letting him down, it's him not doing his job as a manager. You've admitted yourself that he should have set the team up to take a 1-1 draw and he should have done better, but at the same time you say it's very nitpicky to blame Emery? Your argument seems very inconsistent.
I think we've evaluated the game in the same way, but just have a difference in opinion on how that the events of the game affect how much you expect of Emery. In retrospect, I feel a bit more inclined to judge Emery for his reaction to the red card, as it is indeed his job to set the team up to deal with it efficiently. We did indeed fall short in some ways, but Emery did still make defensive adjustments. And I still maintain that because of the refereeing decisions and the way certain players performed, more responsibility should be directed elsewhere. Regardless of Emery, the players shouldn't have conceded the last two goals to Rennes. And so when we're looking back at that performance in particular, I'm looking at them more than Emery.
To draw a comparison, it's like if a couple students fail a test after not studying. Sure, the teacher could possibly have taught the material better, but the bottom line is that the students are to blame because they're responsible for learning and studying the material and haven't done so. It's not a perfect analogy but in the moment on the pitch, the players didn't do their job and Emery can't do much about it. We would have been fine had they done so. And that's without even getting to the offside call and red card.