Country: Bangladesh
Player:White
I said all summer it was Isak, Ekitike as a punt or no-one.
First SolRashGalla now this? Rarely wrong.
I mean a lot of us (myself included) had Ekitike as the best option (excluding Isak) on the market…
I said all summer it was Isak, Ekitike as a punt or no-one.
First SolRashGalla now this? Rarely wrong.
Hard to say since only 6 players have reached 20+ PL goals in their debut season from a foreign league and when you look at the name, you’ll know why. I think people are jumping the gun here, my main thing is whether we get over the line and at this stage things are looking promising given the way we strengthened our squad plus teams paying less attention to Ode/Martinelli compared to Eze/Gyokeres.
I said all summer it was Isak, Ekitike as a punt or no-one.
First SolRashGalla now this? Rarely wrong.
Sorry, I wanted to keep quiet but I don’t see what Gyokeres is doing that is any different from a PL number 9, let alone prime Costa? Unless that was a joke?
Like I’m glad it looks like he’s improving but there’s nothing I’ve seen recently that suggest he’s a cut above the rest, he’s doing the bare minimum of a decent PL striker, running the channels well, battling the defenders, okay hold up.
Genuine Wood, Mateta, Watkins, Solanke, Delap type stuff recently?
Keep me honest please AM as I know I’m a little bias.
I mean a lot of us (myself included) had Ekitike as the best option (excluding Isak) on the market…
Looks like a very good Jesus replacement in fairness. Great for 10-15 goals in all comps but offers a lot more link up for our wingers.
I said he plays like prime Costa compared to what standard Havertz served up in his first couple of months, not that he plays like prime Costa. That would be outrageous.
Nobody says he's a world beater, he never wes. But the way some talk about him like we geniuinely don't play some interesting stuff with him in the team is baffling? Not to mention he's forced to play every minute of every game instead of getting eased in a bit.
And he plays better with each passing game, which is promising. We're now entering some interesting fixture period so let's see how it goes.
I like his profile, still raw, but there is real potential there. I can't believe Liverpool got him and Isak smh. If Arsenal legitimately improved their CF and LW options (Eze is more of an attacking mid), the team would be the best in the world and can legit dominate for years if the best players stay healthy. Gyokeres is a decent player and will score goals, but he kinda reminds me a bit of Podolski. Like a Podolski with work rate.We should have had a proper dig at Ekitike. Liverpool spent most of the summer obsessed with isak
Yeah it’s why I thought we’d be all over him. But I think Berta called shotgun tbf and he’s done good work all round. Like @2Smokeyy says we’ve got more than enough to win the big ones and that’s what’s important.
The next real star quality player that’ll move is Yilmaz. It’ll be interesting to see what happens there. I think there’s a good chance we get rid of Martinelli and try for him.
Lmao yeahYildiz?
berta is not wrong choose gyokeres and i think if we have chance to get alvarez next summer with price 100m++ pounds then we have try to get him
Btw the Ekitike chat just reminded me that not only did @OnlyOne twerk for Tesco he also absolutely shat on Ekitike.
Feels almost threadban worthy that. Shocking stuff.
Yeah it’s why I thought we’d be all over him. But I think Berta called shotgun tbf and he’s done good work all round. Like @2Smokeyy says we’ve got more than enough to win the big ones and that’s what’s important.
Why? He isn’t a 20 goal a season striker that was always my thing. He never will be.
There’s a reason they also bought Isak.
It was either:
Option A - Blow the whole budget on a CF and have the same issues as last season as in sweating whenever a player picks up a knock or plays in a pointless international friendly. Saka, Ødegaard and co being pushed to the maximum.
Option B - Go for a more balanced squad whereby players can be rotated and kept fresh as there isn’t much of a drop in quality. Different players coming in and out of form at various stages of the season with there being less of a creative burden on one player. To put it into context, one injury to VVD/Konate and it’s crisis mode for Liverpool.
Remains to be seen which one works out. I think Option B will work in our favour over a 38 game season whereas Option A could be more suited to the latter stages of the CL if we come up against a PSG, Barcelona or Bayern.
he’s already got 3 in 5 you weapon![]()
Don’t you mean you’re option B then?Yeah I was on the fence a bit but now I’m firmly option A given we’re a month in and like 6 players already injured fml.
Yeah I was on the fence a bit but now I’m firmly option A given we’re a month in and like 6 players already injured fml.
We needed that depth man. I think with the way the schedule is all teams will come to that conclusion sooner or later. Liverpool were outrageously lucky last season, it’s not a sensible move imo.
NAP - ARS
| Team | P | W | D | L | Goals | GD | Pts | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Manchester City
W
W
W
|
3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7:2 | +5 | 9 | |
| 2 |
Arsenal
W
W
W
|
3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6:1 | +5 | 9 | |
| 3 |
Hull
D
W
W
|
3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3:0 | +3 | 7 | |
| 4 |
Chelsea
L
W
W
|
3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8:7 | +1 | 6 | |
| 5 |
Brentford
D
D
W
|
3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5:2 | +3 | 5 | |
| 6 |
Liverpool
W
D
D
|
3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 6:4 | +2 | 5 | |
| 7 |
Newcastle
D
W
D
|
3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 6:4 | +2 | 5 | |
| 8 |
Everton
D
D
W
|
3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5:3 | +2 | 5 | |
| 9 |
Leeds
D
D
W
|
3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3:2 | +1 | 5 | |
| 10 |
Brighton
D
L
W
|
3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8:5 | +3 | 4 | |
| 11 |
Manchester United
D
W
L
|
3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7:6 | +1 | 4 | |
| 12 |
Sunderland
D
W
L
|
3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3:3 | 0 | 4 | |
| 13 |
Crystal Palace
W
L
L
|
3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4:8 | -4 | 3 | |
| 14 |
Ipswich
L
L
W
|
3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4:8 | -4 | 3 | |
| 15 |
Bournemouth
D
D
L
|
3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4:5 | -1 | 2 | |
| 16 |
Nottingham Forest
D
D
L
|
3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2:3 | -1 | 2 | |
| 17 |
Aston Villa
D
L
L
|
3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0:5 | -5 | 1 | |
| 18 |
Tottenham
D
L
L
|
3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0:5 | -5 | 1 | |
| 19 |
Fulham
L
L
L
|
3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4:7 | -3 | 0 | |
| 20 |
Coventry
L
L
L
|
3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0:5 | -5 | 0 |