• ! ! ! IMPORTANT MESSAGE ! ! !

    Discussions about police investigations

    In light of recent developments about a player from Premier League being arrested and until there is an official announcement, ALL users should refrain from discussing or speculating about situations around personal off-pitch matters related to any Arsenal player. This is to protect you and the forum.

    Users who disregard this reminder will be issued warnings and their posts will get deleted from public.

Wayne Bridge

Glovegun

Established Member
Re: Wayne Bridge on loan?

Unfortunately someone like Bridge is all we can hope for.

Normally a loan signing is a kind of 'try before you buy' scenario, or a way of giving that player experience.

The fact that we aren't looking to sign someone permanently means that we are probably restricted to players who other clubs want to either get off the wage bill for a couple of months, or get a bit of match fitness. The only alternative to someone like Bridge might be a youngster from the continent or the lower leagues who Wenger may consider taking a punt on as a permanent deal in the summer.
 

kalleTheMan

Established Member
Re: Wayne Bridge on loan?

Apparently Maxwell is allowed to leave Barca for 2m euros. Would much prefer him. Milan are said to be interested, which could also open for Taiwo on-loan.
 

Arai

Spam Hunter Bot
Moderator
Re: Wayne Bridge on loan?

Better than nothing...:cry:

Maxwell? Interesting....

Any link for that?
 

GDeep™

League is very weak
Re: Wayne Bridge on loan?

Coquelin done well today but will probably be needed at RB and midfield in the coming games, Bridge would be handy I think.
 

kofigunner

Established Member
Trusted ⭐
Re: Wayne Bridge on loan?

GDeep said:
Coquelin done well today but will probably be needed at RB and midfield in the coming games, Bridge would be handy I think.
Agree with the Coquelin bit. Bridge, no, no, no.
 

dpt49

Established Member
Re: Wayne Bridge on loan?

The Escaped Ape said:
I wish this good news was from somewhere more reliable than Footybunker...

http://www.footybunker.com/arsenal-pull-out-of-left-back-chase/14638
Thank goodness for that.

Although the excuse given was that we don't to pay high wages for a player that is only going to be here for a couple of months. Isn't exactly what we are doing with Henry.

Why don't we just say we are not interested in Bridge because we don't want a player that is rubbish and who seems more interested in money than playing football
 

GDeep™

League is very weak
Re: Wayne Bridge on loan?

No worries, Wenger got it covered, he's giving a trial to 24 year old Omani defender Saas Al-Mukhaini. Get in.
 

Floating

Established Member
Re: Wayne Bridge on loan?

GDeep said:
No worries, Wenger got it covered, he's giving a trial to 24 year old Omani defender Saas Al-Mukhaini. Get in.

He plays in the Omani SECOND division, too. Not even the first division. Seriously.
 

DJ_Markstar

Based and Artetapilled

Player:Martinelli
Re: Wayne Bridge on loan?

And people seriously think Wenger WANTS to sign players from the Omani second division?

Blame the board.
 

ebouenolike

Established Member
Re: Wayne Bridge on loan?

MDGoonah41 said:
our cheapness is staggering

If this is in relation to a loan left back signing then I don't see why it's so staggering. We have Gibbs and Santos BOTH injured, with our 'only use in emergencies LB' Vermaelen injured too what would you suggest?

Do people really expect us to spend a bunch of money on a THIRD CHOICE left back who'd only be needed for a month or so? That would be ridiculous surely.
 

MDGoonah41

Established Member
Re: Wayne Bridge on loan?

cheapness was relying on a guy who has been injured his whole career to be your starting LB, then panic buying a LB who cant defend on deadline day because your starting LB predictably was injured. Everyone but Wenger figured Gibbs would miss a big chunk of this season.
 

ebouenolike

Established Member
Re: Wayne Bridge on loan?

MDGoonah41 said:
cheapness was relying on a guy who has been injured his whole career to be your starting LB, then panic buying a LB who cant defend on deadline day because your starting LB predictably was injured. Everyone but Wenger figured Gibbs would miss a big chunk of this season.

Agree with choosing Gibbs as number one being a very high risk approach. Don't agree that Santos can't defend or was that much of a 'panic buy'.
 

Segway

Well-Known Member
Re: Wayne Bridge on loan?

MDGoonah41 said:
compared to Bridge, Maxwell would be like signing Maldini in his prime.

Some of your posts seriously crack me up :lol:
 

mavelous

Tinfoil hat aficionado
Re: Wayne Bridge on loan?

I like to complain too, but not on misleading facts :lol:

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.fifa.com/associations/association=oma/nationalleague/standings.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.fifa.com/associations/associ ... dings.html</a>
 

dpt49

Established Member
Re: Wayne Bridge on loan?

We have a LB who is always injured and Santos who looks ok as a back up LB so clearly we need a top player and get rid of one of these.

Bearing in mind we are one of the richest clubs in world football, with aspirations of challenging for the top European titles, what are we doing looking at an Omani second division player. Is this how far our ambition has dropped.

I just hope Wenger realises that Gibbs is nearly always going to be crocked, and knowing the amount of players we have at the club collecting vast wages for sitting on the physio's bench, we need players who play, rather than crocks that don't
 
Top Bottom