The thing is a board is meant to have values and set the tone for the club (e.g. the Chelsea rule of not giving long deals to 30+ year olds, Wenger was the same). If you don't have strong leadership these things are more likely to happen. In an ideal world Arteta goes to the board and says "I want Willian, he will improve us", the board tell him the conditions which include him not being tied down to a long term deal for example. They negotiate, it doesnt work out. We move onto the next target.
With having the manager as the deciding factor in a transfer, there isn't really a continuation of our values and plans. Managers change so often in football, and if you don't have a strong set up above him you can lose sight of certain things. At the end of the day managers are well aware that their time at a club is short. I'm sure the average length of a manager's tenure in the PL is the equivalent of the "short term" for clubs- probably around 2-3 years. Manager's are going to want to do whatever maximises their results during their time there, to get results fast. This is Arteta's thinking with Willian.
This is the issue we saw at United. They kept bringing in new managers with different ideas, philosophies, playstyles. This causes havoc for medium to long term squad planning. They finally realised they had to stop and have reset in the last year or so. Tried to keep things stable and play the kids. The thing is, United will never be the same with Woodword and a bunch of "?s" running the club. They need a football man in the boardroom.
In my opinion, signings like Willian happen when you are run poorly. A strong board with medium - long terms targets (thats what is suited to our squad) would not have let us sign Willian on a 3 year deal on big money. If we had a strong board room, we would be trying to run our club like a slightly more rich Leciester. Mostly buy players between the age of 19-25, build them up, make sure they are never losing value on their asset (i.e. keeping on top of their contracts), and selling for extremely high prices when the player has his head turned. If you are on the edge of something successful, you perhaps buy some players already established and in their prime (as we are a big club and should use our power to spend money when its right). Its not easy because Leciester of course have extremely highly skilled people doing what they are doing, but we are so far from that. And our short sightedness is going to hamper how much we really make use of our plethora of fantastic young players. It could be the difference between mid table, 6th place, top 4 and the title in 5-6 years when our best young players really realise their potential.
We are sitting on so much talent and a gold mine value wise. Right now I am worried we don't have strong enough leadership to look after that. Lets see.
Last edited: Jan 22, 2021