Mudi
Well-Known Member
Reminds me of Dzeko. Him and Havertz as the striker options is not bad at all.
And adding more height to the team.
And adding more height to the team.
Yeah I like Zirkzee too, feel like the goals are gonna be the point of contention for a lot of fans but honestly I understand the frustrations there - I'm just not really gonna take it into consideration if we are to sign the player. At this point, I trust Arteta with his recruitment. Even Havertz has won me over.Striker market is still not great there no gurantee 20+ goal scorers apart from Osimhen who i'm sure we not interested because of Napoli demands. so we have to gamble about young guy i like Zirkzee he not only goal scorer but very good all around player too if we miss out Sesko he'd be my fav target specially 40M euros release clause shouldn't be problem to us.
We should act quick to get this done before the Euros. If he has a good tournament, half of Europe will be after him.
True but if he has a really good tournament his value may increase.It's not 1990 anymore where clubs watch tournaments as a form of scouting. All the top clubs know how good he is already
It can still make a difference. Some clubs may think he's not worth activating the release clause because he's not proven enough.It's not 1990 anymore where clubs watch tournaments as a form of scouting. All the top clubs know how good he is already
Proven to be ****.If he extends get Chris wood. Proven PL striker
Either you're joking or you are highIf he extends get Chris wood. Proven PL striker
Nobody was paying that price for Enzo, including Chelsea until after that World Cup. Liverpool weren't going in for Mac Allister either. These tournaments still have an impact on the market.It's not 1990 anymore where clubs watch tournaments as a form of scouting. All the top clubs know how good he is already
Absolutely agree, I also like the way he gets played the ball into space and runs with the ball, Haverts looks to cut back as he doesn't back himself in a running dualLook at it this way
Havertz positives are:
-Actually stays in the box more often than Jesus, roams less unlike Jesus attracted to the ball like moth to flame.
-has a physical presence that actually keeps defenders occupied unlike Jesus
-makes good runs.
-Can win duels against defenders, hold up because he's big.
Havertz weakness:
-weak shot
-poor finishing (still scored at a decent clip when moved to cf second half of the season. Probably touches 20 goals had he started out as cf at the beginning of the season. Hell we probably win the league with him at cf and not Jesus.)
-rarely shoots with his weak foot.
Everything I've seen from Sesko says he has none of Havertz weaknesses. Has all his strengths and is flat out faster/more athletic.
BRING HIM TO THE CARPET IMMEDIATELY.
Nobody was paying that price for Enzo, including Chelsea until after that World Cup. Liverpool weren't going in for Mac Allister either. These tournaments still have an impact on the market.
That is a great comparison actually. Dzeko was very underrated as a striker.Reminds me of Dzeko. Him and Havertz as the striker options is not bad at all.
And adding more height to the team.
Look at it this way
Havertz positives are:
-Actually stays in the box more often than Jesus, roams less unlike Jesus attracted to the ball like moth to flame.
-has a physical presence that actually keeps defenders occupied unlike Jesus
-makes good runs.
-Can win duels against defenders, hold up because he's big.
Havertz weakness:
-weak shot
-poor finishing (still scored at a decent clip when moved to cf second half of the season. Probably touches 20 goals had he started out as cf at the beginning of the season. Hell we probably win the league with him at cf and not Jesus.)
-rarely shoots with his weak foot.
Everything I've seen from Sesko says he has none of Havertz weaknesses. Has all his strengths and is flat out faster/more athletic.
BRING HIM TO THE CARPET IMMEDIATELY.
I think Enzo would've gone for a huge fee without the WC, but Chelsea wouldn't have paid the 120M release clause without it. I think his market would be around 70-80M without the WC. He was one of the best ball progressors in Europe playing for a Benfica side that topped its CL group ahead of PSG, so his market was there, but 100M+ is too much to be justified by it.I'm not sure I'm convinced. Statistically Enzo was 1 of the best in a European league. Caicedo went for similar. But given his price perhaps the world cup added to it. Portugese clubs are elite at fleecing richer teams though
Macallister was probably undervalued if anything when you look at how much Nunes, Lavia and Phillips went for