Does that mean they're going to bring in the 4 or 5 players this summer, or is that also going to be a gradual thing? We've been 4 or 5 players away for years, either do it all in one summer or don't bother.
If he gradually implements more of the rubbish he's served this season, the fans will gradually-at speed- walk away.
With regards to your first point, I think you need to go with the best team you can at all point of times.I know we are 9th now, but we could have finished 6-7th if some other results went our way and if we had had more luck. I don`t think we should have risked that. So I don`t think I agree with the argument that we should have played Willock and AMN because we wouldn`t have got relegated with them.I find your comment largely reasonable with exception of your last paragraph which will mainly be left as agree to disagree. Point is we are midtable with Elneny & Ceballos, who have had considerable match time even though they are mainly backups for Xhaka/Partey. If we had given that match time to Willock and AMN we wouldn't have been relegated, but at least would have learned more as part of the overall "project", instead of Elneny who should have no future at Arsenal, and a loanee (Ceballos). By the end of the season then we would pretty much *all* be in agreement as to whether to sell or keep.
Also, minor quibble. It is reasonable to expect around 6th position with this squad. We won't be bringing in any manager to just work with this squad. It isn't static, and we all assume sells and buys this summer, in tandem with ongoing development of some younger players, for overall work in getting back towards Top 4.
Like @Macho says, this club deserves all the misery it's having. Pack of fools.
Does that mean they're going to bring in the 4 or 5 players this summer, or is that also going to be a gradual thing? We've been 4 or 5 players away for years, either do it all in one summer or don't bother.
Think there is a bit of a misunderstanding here. I never conceded Elneny and Ceballos were the better options. The best and worst case with Willock and ANN cannot be precisely defined, but all I said is we wouldn't have been relegated regardless. The difference between 10th and 15th isn't meaningful. Actually carrying through a "project" when you say you are instead of band-aids is.With regards to your first point, I think you need to go with the best team you can at all point of times.I know we are 9th now, but we could have finished 6-7th if some other results went our way and if we had had more luck. I don`t think we should have risked that. So I don`t think I agree with the argument that we should have played Willock and AMN because we wouldn`t have got relegated with them.
Regarding the second point, I do agree. This mean that any manager we bring in again should be someone who could work in the long run. We should be able to accept highs and lows and slow improvement. Thats exactly the reason I am not completely against Arteta though. We wouldn`t get anywhere if we expect a new coach to come be as good as Wenger and get top 4 position while playing youngsters and also playing attacking football. I think its not even fair to expect that.
I’m looking at the Chelsea vs Real Madrid highlights and I can’t help but wonder how Lampard had this team all the way down to 9th....
Think there is a bit of a misunderstanding here. I never conceded Elneny and Ceballos were the better options. The best and worst case with Willock and ANN cannot be precisely defined, but all I said is we wouldn't have been relegated regardless. The difference between 10th and 15th isn't meaningful. Actually carrying through a "project" when you say you are instead of band-aids is.
I just pointed out Elneny/Ceballos have proven to be deadenders meaning we've wasted a season with players we know are going nowhere and therefore have no learnings or progress with what is supposed to be a "project". To be fair to Ceballos he had a decent run-in last season but when things weren't going well for him this season and it was clear he wasn't proving we should buy him.on a permanent his minutes should have gone elsewhere. We have depreciated AMN as an asset through marginalisation, and in a Covid situation where the club is losing money that is not smart.
For Willock I have gone into his upside and potential ceiling in his thread. With few exceptions (Cesc, Jack), it is hard for any CM under 22 years old to be a consistent high performer in the PL. They need match time to maintain and grow technical skills while patience is afforded for things to click with tactical and positional awareness, as well as decision making. Many on here at A-M were saying "sell, sell, sell" for Aaron Rsmsey when Arsène was giving him lots of minutes when it looked to people here that his progress had stalled out, because they didn't understand. Willock is breaking through with decision making and we are seeing it in part with end product now, and I'm sure he can take that forwards in refining an overall #8 role long term.
Willock and AMN are still developing players in young age. Elneny and Ceballos are proving to be deadenders, and again, we're talking about overall backups to Xhaka/Partey here, not expected first choice regulars for this season.
Quite something to see a comment saying players would be lucky to be as good as Elneny. Think I'll leave it there without going into another case of subjectivity stated as matter of fact, something I personally try to avoid.Developing =/= better, cause Willock and AMN can count themselves lucky if they become as good as Elneny in the future. Again we're talking about overall backups to Xhaka/Partey here, not expected first choice regulars for this season, and it's not like we would be in a much better place if Willock and AMN were performing better. Their talent level isn't so high that they could be carrying us.
Quite something to see a comment saying players would be lucky to be as good as Elneny. Think I'll leave it there without going into another case of subjectivity stated as matter of fact, something I personally try to avoid.