DJ_Markstar
Based and Artetapilled
Player:Martinelli
outlaw_member said:I think some people watch football with their eyes closed. Fabregas could never perform the role that Arteta has over the past few years. For the simple fact that Mikel can tackle, whilst Cesc cannot. Since arriving from Everton, Arteta has averaged about 4-5 tackles per game. That is a significant number for a player performing as part of a pivot. When you add Ramsey's tackling numbers into the mix, it's no wonder that together they formed the best central midfield partnership we've had for a very long time.
Oh the ironing!
Seriously though, Mikel can't tackle to any credible standard and anyone who watches football with their eyes open can see that. He's a positional player who relies on intelligence and technical ability rather than any physical presence which is why he's such a poor DM in this league and for this team. It also doesn't help that his previously average physical stature has deteriorated further and further - his legs are gone and he gets outmussled by shellfish.
I also think people forget that Fabregas would regularly top the charts for KM run in a match - his workrate was unequalled in his time here.
In addition, I think a lot are missing the point. Kallstrom was bought in to replace Ramsey for his injury, right? Wrong. He was brought in because Ramsey will probably get a recurrence of his injury or need resting during the season. Squad depth, people. Özil is the same.
Cesc is also a different sort of playmaker to Özil - the sort of direct running that Özil showed vs. Soton was a regular occurrence for Fabregas here and would be again. We'd have proper midfield rotation amongst world class players, and we could set up shop differently against different opponents.
The only negative I can think of is that it might use up funds that should be spent on other areas of the team first.