He said Smalling (in his opinion).
-
! ! ! IMPORTANT MESSAGE ! ! !
Discussions about police investigations
In light of recent developments about a player from Premier League being arrested and until there is an official announcement, ALL users should refrain from discussing or speculating about situations around personal off-pitch matters related to any Arsenal player. This is to protect you and the forum.
Users who disregard this reminder will be issued warnings and their posts will get deleted from public.
Alexis Sanchez (Out)
- Thread starter blaze_of_glory
- Start date
- Replies 8,959
- Views 1,051,709
- Status
He said Smalling (in his opinion).
Highbury_2006
Village Idiot
The fact that we are playing like shiet doesnt make me happier.
I'd take Mata over Mkhi if offered
Jury
A-M's drunk uncle
No difference in selling him to Man Utd or City? Jesus, come on man.
Highbury_2006
Village Idiot
A big joke if true.
SingmeasongSong
Right Sometimes
There is a huge difference between selling to City and ManU.
City is miles and miles ahead not only to us but also to ManU.
In fact, ManU has nothing on us in quality.
You cannot measure quality only based on a mere points gap.
Actually, ManU was very lucky to win some games and we've been rustled in more than one game due to disastrous acting of referees.
Slartibartfast
CIES Loyalist
Aside from it being Mourinho, no. He could go to either club for free in the summer. And either club can afford to buy a similar player if he didn't. So what's the difference?
grim_tales1
Active Member
I don't blame Alexis for leaving, he was such a great player for us and I loved him, its just a real shame we're selling our best player to a rival (again) 
If he went to City he basically gets a free PL medal.
If he went to City he basically gets a free PL medal.
Emmanueleboue2
Active Member
Taking uniteds dross on top of loosing sanchez to them is like knowing your wife cheated only to find out she cheated with your brother.
its like juventus did to the small clubs in italy, give them high salary dross for their best players. Now its working and we are on the bad end of it. shambles.
its like juventus did to the small clubs in italy, give them high salary dross for their best players. Now its working and we are on the bad end of it. shambles.
Highbury_2006
Village Idiot
Who looks like a fat Ross Geller.
Jury
A-M's drunk uncle
City are away and gone and we aren't a threat to them. We have to be realistic and choose our battles. We've finished above Man Utd ever since Fergie retired and are still well in touch with them in a race for 4th place THIS season. And you think selling a player that will improve them immeasurably rather than have him merely garnish Citys squad, is 'the same thing'. You must just want him gone if you're wiling to use such flawed reasoning to advocate his sale.
Last edited:
TheLawOfDiQ
Active Member
Not really, we would do 100x better if we had an owner that spent our own money. Our owner could make us better than Man City with his pockets, but he chooses not to put any of his money in.
What other club in the world lets their best players contracts run down? We don't need an owner with deep pockets, we need an owner that gives a ****.
Player:Martinelli
Martial, Rashford or Mhiki.
say yes
forum master baiter
Sammy1887
New Year, Same Hate For Reed
If its a 30m plus the player. Then, I don't really mind Shaw, Mata or Mkhi.
People hoping for Martial or Rashford should stop trying.
People hoping for Martial or Rashford should stop trying.
Slartibartfast
CIES Loyalist
I was actually the one who pointed out that Arsenal had finished above United for four straight seasons a couple of days ago, so obviously I'm well aware of that. But as things stand, Arsenal is 8 points behind United and very likely to be 11 points back before the weekend's games are done. The chances of finishing ahead of them this year are slim and rapidly heading toward none. Liverpool and Sp**s are the clubs that should be Arsenal's focus for the rest of this season.
Also, where did I advocate for the sale of Alexis? I was the one who was adamant all summer that Arsenal needed to keep him and let him run out his contract if need be. But they're going to sell him. It's a simple fact we have to face. And in light of that fact, Arsenal needs to get the best deal they possibly can. I could see an argument for not selling him to Liverpool because Arsenal still has some chance of finishing ahead of them. But to refuse to sell him to United and get the best deal because of some vague hope of finishing ahead of them again this year would be basically cutting off the nose to spite the face.
You're basing your opinion on emotion. I'm basing my opinion on the reality of the situation.
GDeep™
League is very weak
Bottom of the barrel stuff either way
GDeep™
League is very weak
All three horrendous players, Shaw, Mata and Mikhi
Country: England
United? Oh Jesus Christ.
An elite attacker is what they’re missing, City aren’t missing anything. This club doesn’t have a strategic bone between all their bodies. Ridiculous.
An elite attacker is what they’re missing, City aren’t missing anything. This club doesn’t have a strategic bone between all their bodies. Ridiculous.
Sammy1887
New Year, Same Hate For Reed
Beggars can't be choosers Gagan.
- Status
