GoonerJay24
Well-Known Member
Lmao.
I dunno, he improved massively
Lmao.
He's not elite though.I dunno, he improved massively
It is a point that seems paradoxical, and I’m curious the different ways people might address it/their thoughts on it. This idea that despite the overall talent pool growing, the talent level is decreasing.The clubs earn a lot more money also, so paying more is natural.
No one has ever here argued how the level of players doesn't go up, if the number of players practicing football in the world goes up.
It's weird. I only see claims that it isn't true, but no reasoning at all.
Let's say if the number of players who practice football in the world has doubled in 20 years. For example 1 million vs. 2 million.
You guys are saying that there won't be more top players available? Or that the competition to rise to the top isn’t harder? Which means you have to be better than before.
This. On average these players might be better athletes but their skill level is considerably lower and most of the self expression has been coached out of the game. Hazard and Özil might have been the last guys with technical quality you could compare (and even then it wasn't close) to the Bergkamp/Henry/Cantona sorts.Talent wise, can someone name me a position across the pitch that this era is superior to than in any year within the 00s?
This era is flooded with system players whereby the managers are the stars of the show.
Exactly. Freedom of expression is coached out of modern players, so you’re not going to get those jaw dropping moments of self confidence and outrageous skill of the entertainer that used to take your breath away.This. On average these players might be better athletes but their skill level is considerably lower and most of the self expression has been coached out of the game. Hazard and Özil might have been the last guys with technical quality you could compare (and even then it wasn't close) to the Bergkamp/Henry/Cantona sorts.