GDeep™
League is very weak
Why’s is embarrassing? That’s probably kids from all over the world having a fit on Twitter.I see #Artetaout is trending , crazy, this is seriously embarrassing .
Why’s is embarrassing? That’s probably kids from all over the world having a fit on Twitter.I see #Artetaout is trending , crazy, this is seriously embarrassing .
I also feel people are forgetting that this is his first job and usually managers making the same kind of mistakes he's making early on in a career are doing so at a much lower profile job with much lower stakes. I agree, there is a lot of valid criticism that can be made but to discount 3/4 of the season that were excellent because of 1/4 that wasn't is just gross and pathetic.Let's be real. There are a vocal minority of Arsenal fans on Twitter etc that loathe Arteta for the type of personality he is, how he cast out underperforming fan favourites and for getting financial backing from the club that later years Wenger and Emery never did.
There are genuine criticisms of Arteta that hold water, his tactics and management style all can and need to be improved in certain areas, no-one can deny that but it should also be crystal clear that he's one of the most promising young managers in the game currently.
The last month or so has been crap and I'm not happy with the situation and that includes Arteta as one of my primary concerns but the really over the top knee jerk stuff against him is so silly.
If Arteta takes the sole blame for the last month or so, okay, then surely he deserves the sole credit for the previous 30 odd PL games this season. I don't agree with that logic but if it's being used to paint him in a bad light now it should equally be used for the good he's done.
This isn't me white knighting for Arteta or trying to say he shouldn't be criticised, he should be for various errors he's made. For example no-one will be more critical of how he used Partey last night than me, it was atrocious but I'm going to view it in context of the whole season.
That’s just it. I’m fine with putting up with his growing pains if we are showing overall improvement or progress. If we have a few seasons of top 3 while City are at their peak like this it’s totally fine. To say that if he doesn’t win the title next year he should be out is ludicrous.I also feel people are forgetting that this is his first job and usually managers making the same kind of mistakes he's making early on in a career are doing so at a much lower profile job with much lower stakes. I agree, there is a lot of valid criticism that can be made but to discount 3/4 of the season that were excellent because of 1/4 that wasn't is just gross and pathetic.
Why’s is embarrassing? That’s probably kids from all over the world having a fit on Twitter.
Nine Hag
So going by the reports I’ve seen the last week or so, it sounds like KSE are going to back this guy again, another £200-300m spend and he surely has to go if we don’t win the league, no?
Arsenal are no different to these other oil clubs now. All future success is from owner investment.
Sad stuff.
Ok so yeah, we would have lost on goal difference but still, we would have been able to say we left it all on the field and came up short. But to capitulate at in the last 7-8 games, we didn't give ourselves a chance. That is on the Manager. Just like most fans had their heads shoved up Arteta's ass for the first 30 odd games for having us first, they should be kicking his ass for crumbling when it really mattered. But no, all I see is most Arteta fans blaming the players, squad depth, Man Citys spending, our lack of spending, Saliba's injury etc - Anything but the Manager.See how you created a strawman immediately like every histrionic goofball with no actual point to make. There are legitimate criticisms of Arteta to be made. All you're doing is pissing and moaning for the sake of it. By the way, you're not even smart enough to do your math properly. Assuming City win both of their matches and we beat Wolves, even winning the fixtures you mentioned would give us an extra 10 points (2+2+3+3) which would bring us level on 94 points with City where we would lose on goal difference. What's so f*cking difficult to understand??
So you want to put the last 7 games on him while diminishing what he achieved the first 30. You don't want to have a rational discussion at all. You're arguing against an extreme position with your own extreme position instead of looking for the truth in the middle.Ok so yeah, we would have lost on goal difference but still, we would have been able to say we left it all on the field and came up short. But to capitulate at in the last 7-8 games, we didn't give ourselves a chance. That is on the Manager. Just like most fans had their heads shoved up Arteta's ass for the first 30 odd games for having us first, they should be kicking his ass for crumbling when it really mattered. But no, all I see is most Arteta fans blaming the players, squad depth, Man Citys spending, our lack of spending, Saliba's injury etc - Anything but the Manager.
I think we'll find a couple of players under the proverbial bus in the summer. Arteta will play a different tune then imoWhat he says publicly isn’t the same as what he tells them behind closed doors.
What did Lfc do with less money, so unless he is number 1 net spend he can never be expected to win anything apparently. Stan isn’t rich enough, Edu isn’t good enough but Arteta did greatSo this is a statistic that was circulated recently, which puts into perspective the level of spending since Pep Guardiola came into the Premier League.
I think lets be clear on the level of spending required to compete at the top of the PL and go far in the CL. Arsenal have been lagging behind for years, with a lot of that reported 772m coming in the last 5 years.
You cannot compete if you arent willing to pay the money. There is no escaping this.
Oh yeah who else’s fault is it other than the manager. Yeah fans who see his glaring errors are to blame but not the guy who makes the team sheet. Amazing how everyone else is to blame. Stan is not rich enough, the players who got 50 points in half season not good enough, the club not good enough, now the fans aren’t good enough.There are segments of this fanbase who are so insufferable that the universe might not want us to win because of them.
Ok so yeah, we would have lost on goal difference but still, we would have been able to say we left it all on the field and came up short. But to capitulate at in the last 7-8 games, we didn't give ourselves a chance. That is on the Manager. Just like most fans had their heads shoved up Arteta's ass for the first 30 odd games for having us first, they should be kicking his ass for crumbling when it really mattered. But no, all I see is most Arteta fans blaming the players, squad depth, Man Citys spending, our lack of spending, Saliba's injury etc - Anything but the Manager.
I really hope our rather pathetic fanbase will demand more than top 4 from this fraud next season. If he doesnt win a major title he should get sacked. A serious club would have sacked him a long time ago as a matter of fact. He is our Ole but with a title.
100 percent ent on Arteta no one else has even one percent of blame
Oh yeah who else’s fault is it other than the manager. Yeah fans who see his glaring errors are to blame but not the guy who makes the team sheet. Amazing how everyone else is to blame. Stan is not rich enough, the players who got 50 points in half season not good enough, the club not good enough, now the fans aren’t good enough.
The fact is one guy is 100 percent to blame, this like Putin blaming gay satanists for why he invaded Ukraine
Do they give a trophy for halfway 50? A manager who can’t positively close out a year (now 3 straight bad year endings) is as useful as t.ts on a bull. At the start of season consensus was CL qualification or firing. He did that so i suppose he gets minimal credit for accomplishing in 4 tries what ETH did in oneSo following the logic of these posts… the players are good enough because they achieved 50 points in half a season… but the manager who managed them to get those 50 points is not good enough? But also, the manager is 100% to blame… but gets no credit for the 50 points in half the season? Interesting.