- Thread starter
- #301
Country: Iceland
Over a longer period of time, these things average out.
Hmmm not sure I like this chart - the classification into "title winning form", "UCL form" etc. seems a bit arbitrary to me as it uses pure xGD/90 which can fluctuate wildly per season - e.g., the 99 pt Liverpool champion team had an xGD/90 of < 1 ffs while 2nd place City who finished 18 pts behind had an xGD/90 > 1.
According to this chart, that Liverpool team weren't in "title winning form". Indeed, it considers our 100 pt pace start last season to not be in title winning form. Isn't that objectively rubbish? Am I reading this chart incorrectly?
When you say it I agree. Maybe the classification into the groups needs to be defined better?
Seems that Arteta’s game management is not so bad.Klopp the king of game-changing substitutions? Arteta among three managers doing it better...
Jurgen Klopp has received plenty of praise this season for his game-changing substitutions. But the Liverpool boss is only fourth when it comes to ranking the top managers for goal-scoring subs...www.football365.com
Seems that Arteta’s game management is not so bad.
It's one area where he's improved a lot with more experience.
Seems that Arteta’s game management is not so bad.
If this is the case. Arsenal wouldn't be 3rd but lower.The other conclusion here could be that his starting lineups aren't good but he eventually brings on the right players?