Wut? Özil and Giroud were obviously technically good.Arreta said he wanted to play attacking football. For now, we don’t have the right players. Most of our players in the squad are not skillful, and not entertaining to watch. However, I’m glad Arteta’s transfer targets are all technical players.
——Willian——Martinelli——Pepe——————
——Aouar———Partey——Coutinho/Ceballos
—Tierney——Saliba——Gabriel——RB———
——————————Leno——————————-
My skillful/technical Arsenal is back, playing the most beautiful/entertaining football in the world!!!!
No giroud, no ramsey, no walcott, no Özil, no chamberlain.....No more shxt players!!! No more ”efficient/direct/keep things simple” shxt!!!
We need our skillful/technical Sanchez, Cazorla, Hleb, Nasri, Fabregas, Arshavin, van Persie back!!!
Firmino, Benzema, Van Persie, Mbappe, Neymar, Son, Suarez, Tevez, Salah.......Wut? Özil and Giroud were obviously technically good.
Giroud has had 99 appearances for France and scored 90 goals, Benzema 81 appearances, 27 goals.Firmino, Benzema, Van Persie, Mbappe, Neymar, Son, Suarez, Tevez, Salah.......
Giroud was not 1% as skillful as them.
What are you on about? I didn’t say benzema is better at scoring, I said he is more skillful.Giroud has had 99 appearances for France and scored 90 goals, Benzema 81 appearances, 27 goals.
Considering Giroud has 1% the skill of Benzema, those stats take some explaining
Giroud has had 99 appearances for France and scored 90 goals, Benzema 81 appearances, 27 goals.
Giroud has had 99 appearances for France and scored 90 goals, Benzema 81 appearances, 27 goals.
Considering Giroud has 1% the skill of Benzema, those stats take some explaining
If you have players with better football iq/game reading/skills/ball control/combination play, like Benzema/Firmino/Van Persie/Suarez/Iniesta/KDB/Silva....Don't bother, the guy is hellbent about sexy beautiful skills. Goals don't matter.
If you have players with better football iq/game reading/skills/ball control/combination play, like Benzema/Firmino/Van Persie/Suarez/Iniesta/KDB/Silva....
Your team will have more possession, create more chance, and score more goals. Because they have contributed a hell lot in the general play.
Giroud has had 99 appearances for France and scored 90 goals, Benzema 81 appearances, 27 goals.
Considering Giroud has 1% the skill of Benzema, those stats take some explaining
Yeah 40 goals, beginning to think I need glasses, can't even read Wikipaedia anymore ffs.40 goals******
Yeah 40 goals, beginning to think I need glasses, can't even read Wikipaedia anymore ffs.
Özil is past it as a player. And physically he cannot compete. When people say Özil is lazy and does not track back that is simply not true. He does all of that. But his biggest problem is his inability to win a 50-50. And even worse, he shirks away from a lot of physical challenges. In today's football all 11 players have to try the hardest to win the ball. That is simply a non negotiable. And for Özil he cannot do that anymore
My manic pup was chewing my feet at the time, typing through the pain bro.More than that what made you think Giroud would score 90 goals in 99 games for France. Man went goalless the entire World Cup.
Özil was not participating enough in the general play, will not help us in possession. His ball control in crowded area/dribbling skills was not 1% as good. Özil keeps things simple and efficient, he won’t make entertaining and complicated combination with teammate to confuse the opponent.
If you have players with better football iq/game reading/skills/ball control/combination play, like Benzema/Firmino/Van Persie/Suarez/Iniesta/KDB/Silva....
Your team will have more possession, create more chance, and score more goals. Because these players have contributed a hell lot in the general play.
(I don’t care about goals??)
If you have a front line of owen, aubameyang, inzaghi, and a midfield of lampard, gerrard and ramsey, your team will lost 10-0 every game. Because these players contributed nothing in the general play. Your strikers needed other players to feed them, waiting to score goals rather than contributing to the attacking play. And your midfielders are not “play creators”/“play contributors” too. They go for goals themselves.
Your team will get outnumbered and lost possession. Your team will create less chance and score less goals (despite having all the goal scorers/goal scoring midfielders in your team). Because they are such a fxxking liability in the general play.
@Furious @Makingtrax
@Makavelii
Perfect example was last evening. Although Leicester do have some really good passers of the ball too, threading passes into the channels. You don't need Xavi levels of accuracy as there is more space to work with. But if you're competent and you can spot the runs quickly (helps if you know which runs the forwards are gonna make by working at it in training) you're golden.That's not the only way to score goals, another way to score goals is to have players in your team who can run a lot. If you can make more runs you can exhaust your opponent's defenders and force them into making mistakes. You can also win the ball back and frustrate your opponent's attacks. And modern football has evolved to the stage where runners have become more important than creative players.