SK___
Well-Known Member
if this flops I’ll be pissed
This guy is not nearly rich enough to buy a club like Arsenal. He’s valued at about 4b where most of that is shares in a company that does not even make profits yet. He’s not gangster like Lord Usmanov he prob doesn’t have enough cash to buy Neymar let alone Arsenal FC. If he does takeover the club it will be a highly leveraged deal any money that comes in will be borrowed as well.
A 38 year old with no experience and not enough money taking over and running the club. Sounds somewhat familiar. What could possibly go wrong?
Funny isn't it? Only if dodgy human rights violators with ties to modern day dictatorship take over your club you're gonna have a good time.Imagine being a music artist right now getting short changed by Spotify, having to watch this ****er roleplay as the good guy with his childhood heroes
This reeks of a PR move to capitalize on the movement. Maybe I'm wrong, but it takes quite a bit to make me trust these rich ****s.
In any case, it's ownership transferring from one rich asshole to the next. It won't fix the actual problem, but it might make your situation a bit better.
Look how that worked out.Not even Kroenke was rich enough to buy Arsenal. He had to borrow money.
This is simultaneously one of the cringiest/alpha things I've seen on this forum.Yeah people need a dose of realism and on AM they call me Madrid cos I keep it real.
You could do well enough with a professional unit like Fenway Sports Group taking over. They did a fantastic job turning things around at Liverpool without investing too much. Obviously nothing beats a Russian oligarch or Middle East sheikh.Funny isn't it? Only if dodgy human rights violators with ties to modern day dictatorship take over your club you're gonna have a good time.
You could do well enough with a professional unit like Fenway Sports Group taking over. They did a fantastic job turning things around at Liverpool without investing too much. Obviously nothing beats a Russian oligarch or Middle East sheikh.
Riddle me this then. How does someone worth 4 billion which consists mostly of shares in a company that doesn’t make profits and therefore cannot pay dividends, afford to pay a 2 bil loan taken over an asset that also doesn’t pay dividends? Where is he going to get the 200-400m a year it costs to service this loan? Is he really going to liquidate 5-10% of his position in a company he founded every year just for the pleasure of owning Arsenal FC?No billionaire has that amount just in an account waiting to be used. It’s spread across stocks and bonds etc which Ek would use to secure a bank loan.
Unpopular opinion: I would rather stick with the Kroenke's than go with this guy but let me caveat that statement, it has to be the Kroenke's with the RIGHT people. The worst sin the Kroenke's have committed have been putting their faith into the wrong people. They have been taken for a ride by charlatans and opportunists and they have no real knowledge of the European market or footballing culture. If in the summer the Kroenkes were to hire a Monchi or a Luis Campos to oversee the club on their behalf, would we see that as a move to the right direction?
However, they do have experience in running major sport enterprises unlike Ek. I am cautious as to why now Ek has seemingly decided to let his interest known to the public, especially when we're in the midst of a big European tie. This could feel like a big distraction on the players. And obviously, getting the Invincibles to join your 'benevolent' cause seems like a cheap pull on the heart strings to garner more fans and cause ire towards the Kroenkes. I mean come on the timing couldn't be any better and he first showed his interest by a tweet. Seems calculated to me; I'm not sold yet. If I had a couple billions spare I would try to buy Arsenal too but questions have to be asked such as "what are you going to do differently?"
I’m not his lawyer or financial planner. I have no idea on his other investments or real net worth.Riddle me this then. How does someone worth 4 billion which consists mostly of shares in a company that doesn’t make profits and therefore cannot pay dividends, afford to pay a 2 bil loan taken over an asset that also doesn’t pay dividends? Where is he going to get the 200-400m a year it costs to service this loan? Is he really going to liquidate 5-10% of his position in a company he founded every year just for the pleasure of owning Arsenal FC?
With Kroenke you could easily imagine that the funds to service his loans came from his other profitable business interests. That’s what other billionaires do they use cheap debt to purchase assets which they service using the cash flows from their other profitable assets, resulting in a net increase in assets every year. The power of leveraging : cheap debt which allows you to buy more assets without selling your existing ones.
So the 2 billion dollar question, how does a man without a significant cash flow afford to pay a 2 billion dollar loan?
They are not losing money or struggling. Nothing indicates they want to sell. Also as a Swede I really wouldn’t want a swede in charge. Swedish people are tight with money by natureUsmanov tried buying the club when we were in the UCL every year and the Super League was still in the pipeline. It was also before a global pandemic. KSE have more reason to sell now than then.
Usmanov tried buying the club when we were in the UCL every year and the Super League was still in the pipeline. It was also before a global pandemic. KSE have more reason to sell now than then.