Country: England
Player:Rice
@Trilly Still no answer?
Thought you and Drippin had fallen out?
He told me you threatened to unfriend him on Facebook when he wouldn't agree with you that Cedric would take Lauren in a scrap.
@Trilly Still no answer?
Henceforth you shall now be known as Supligen.@Trilly Still no answer?
I only respond to mentions from people who have earned my respect. You ran off the forum when the going got tough, would you respect you in my shoes?Thanks! What did I miss? Not doom & gloom on AM I hope, would never want to miss that for sure!
Looks like we are still 4th in the league.
Great results and performances also in the past two games, but I wasn't too worried after the Southampton game still because the playing was pretty good despite the result and the injuries.
@Trilly Is Arteta a cheque book manager if he gets us 4th on our run-in without having had Partey, Tierney, Tomiyasu and Lacazette playing much at the end of the season?
Xavi has been there since November. Arteta has been at his job since Dec 2019. Arteta took over a team that finished 5th. 3 years later and 200 million if he finish 5th he will get credit. No manager for a big club has ever given as much leeway and patient
If Emery’s first half of that season was disaster and the team was underachieving. Why did Arteta straight away start to downplay the teams level? Arsenal was 8th when Emery was sacked. 1 point of 5th. Arteta finished 8th that season and the season after. So if Emery after 13 games was 8th means disaster. Arteta after 60 league games took us to 8th. So if Emery was underachieving, then Arteta did it even worseThe point in bold, although factually correct, is a bit disingenuous. Let's not pretend that the first half of 19/20 under Emery was anything other than a disaster, Arteta picked up an underperforming team with what seemed from thr outside looking in, a broken dressing room. We did also win the cup that season.
No they weren’t.Arsenal was 8th when Emery was sacked.
It depends on how you see things. My stance, which I have stated long time ago, is that I won't be here a lot if things go wrong. This forum is unbearable at that point. It's so pessimistic and full of whining even when things go well.I only respond to mentions from people who have earned my respect. You ran off the forum when the going got tough, would you respect you in my shoes?
P.s. you would know the answer to your question if had stuck around. Believe it or not, I don’t have agendas.
If Emery’s first half of that season was disaster and the team was underachieving. Why did Arteta straight away start to downplay the teams level? Arsenal was 8th when Emery was sacked. 1 point of 5th. Arteta finished 8th that season and the season after. So if Emery after 13 games was 8th means disaster. Arteta after 60 league games took us to 8th. So if Emery was underachieving, then Arteta did it even worse
Yes. So 8th after 13 gsmes was disaster for Emery. But not for Arteta after 60 games. Only difference was 8 was as low Emery went. Arteta took us near relegation and changed everyone’s expectations.No they weren’t.
Edit: my mistake, they were. But they were worse off when Arteta eventually took over.
My point is Arteta is very lucky manager. First he was lucky to get the job with zero experience. Secondly he was lucky he wasn’t sacked last season. He may end up being hood manager and even successful. It doesn’t change those two things. I really can’t think of a manager who had as bad of a run as Arteta did at some point last season and kept their job. The past is the past thoughI agree we could have seen more progress faster under Arteta, maybe this seasons form last season, but this narrative that he came in and took a functioning set of players because of the season priors 5th placed finish is a myth.
Wasn't on here at the time but I can only imagine the feeling after some of the results and performances (and general vibe of the players) at the end of the Emery reign.
My point is Arteta is very lucky manager. First he was lucky to get the job with zero experience. Secondly he was lucky he wasn’t sacked last season. He may end up being hood manager and even successful. It doesn’t change those two things. I really can’t think of a manager who had as bad of a run as Arteta did at some point last season and kept their job. The past is the past though
The only reason I keep responding to it is his fans keep changing the narrative and lying about how bad things were when he took over
It's a bit misleading to say this like you say. Arsenal was 11th when Arteta took over and got us an FA Cup win. You forgot to mention Ljungberg costing us games in between.If Emery’s first half of that season was disaster and the team was underachieving. Why did Arteta straight away start to downplay the teams level? Arsenal was 8th when Emery was sacked. 1 point of 5th. Arteta finished 8th that season and the season after. So if Emery after 13 games was 8th means disaster. Arteta after 60 league games took us to 8th. So if Emery was underachieving, then Arteta did it even worse
It's a bit misleading to say this like you say. Arsenal was 11th when Arteta took over and got us an FA Cup win.
And the biggest reason why Emery was sacked was that he lost the dressing room. Arteta has never lost the dressing room, even in difficult times.
"When Arteta took over in December 2019, the club was in disarray.
Arsenal were 11th in the table with a squad of underperforming players who had lost their identity, an enormous wage bill, and volatile backroom who seemed to be on a revolving door in and out of the club.
Arsenal’s situation was bleak, and the Covid-19 pandemic 15 games into Arteta’s reign did not help matters.
Arsenal ended the 2019/20 season in eighth, but beating Manchester City and Chelsea en route to lifting the FA Cup was a real high point in a period of struggles."
100 games in charge: How has Mikel Arteta done?
Mikel Arteta won his 100th game in charge of Arsenal last weekend, beating Watford 1-0 at the Emirates.www.islingtongazette.co.uk
Yeah, it's actually quite astonishing feat to not lose dressing room while having trouble with the star players. And getting through very tough patches of results and performances.The point about Arteta never loosing the dressing room is important I think. Some will probably rightfully say that anyone he disagrees with is out of the door (Auba/Özil ect), but isn't that what most successful managers do?
I'm in no way comparing Arteta to any of these guys, but look at the players Fergie/Pep/Mourinho ect hounded out of their clubs. Maybe that side of Arteta should be seen as a strength of his?
But then why hire Arteta. When your club is in such a mess and you have so many problems. Why would you say I think we need a guy who never managed before to fix this mess. Logically there was no reason he should have even been considered for the job. Hence why I say he is very lucky managerIt's a bit misleading to say this like you say. Arsenal was 11th when Arteta took over and got us an FA Cup win. You forgot to mention Ljungberg costing us games in between.
And the biggest reason why Emery was sacked was that he lost the dressing room. Arteta has never lost the dressing room, even in difficult times.
"When Arteta took over in December 2019, the club was in disarray.
Arsenal were 11th in the table with a squad of underperforming players who had lost their identity, an enormous wage bill, and volatile backroom who seemed to be on a revolving door in and out of the club.
Arsenal’s situation was bleak, and the Covid-19 pandemic 15 games into Arteta’s reign did not help matters.
Arsenal ended the 2019/20 season in eighth, but beating Manchester City and Chelsea en route to lifting the FA Cup was a real high point in a period of struggles."
100 games in charge: How has Mikel Arteta done?
Mikel Arteta won his 100th game in charge of Arsenal last weekend, beating Watford 1-0 at the Emirates.www.islingtongazette.co.uk
Well, not every manager wants to come and clean the mess we were in. United who have a lot more money than us, also got Ole who didn't have exactly the best resume.But then why hire Arteta. When your club is in such a mess and you have so many problems. Why would you say I think we need a guy who never managed before to fix this mess. Logically there was no reason he should have even been considered for the job. Hence why I say he is very lucky manager
Well both United and us are badly run clubs run mostly by none footballing peopleWell, not every manager wants to come and clean the mess we were in. United who have a lot more money than us, also got Ole who didn't have exactly the best resume.