outlaw_member
Established Member
We must find a way to get the best out of Podolski and Giroud. Even if that means reverting to a 4-4-2.
eye4goal said:Anzac said:eye4goal said:---------------Szczesney
Sagna---Mertesacker----Vermaelen---Gibbs
-------Diaby----Arteta---Wilshere
Walcott---------Cazorla----------Podolski
Curious - Cazorla as a 'false 9' in a Messi role = Barca Lite?
Yeah, I think that would allow us to start both Walcott and Podolski and keep them higher up the pitch(4-3-1-2 you could say). I like Giroud but our style of play is more or less the opposite of that of Montpellier so I don't get why he was bought as a starter.
I'd even be tempted to start Chamakh upfront if Cazorla is going to drop into the midfield trio. Torres isn't scoring that many at Chelsea but he's a good foil for the players around him and Chamakh is similar to him
dreamLord said:I'm not going to say I've been calling for Podolski AM and Cazorla LW for a long time.
But I've been calling for Podolski AM and Cazorla LW for a long time.
pikey2000 said:I'd give this a try.
For reason's others have mentioned such as lack of real wingers and crap full backs.
Gives balance at the back of height and pace.
Midfield packed with technique.
Front line with pace and power, adaptable to the opponent.
dysphoria said:pikey2000 said:I'd give this a try.
For reason's others have mentioned such as lack of real wingers and crap full backs.
Gives balance at the back of height and pace.
Midfield packed with technique.
Front line with pace and power, adaptable to the opponent.
i love this idea, it makes more sense then to stick with a traditional back four, gives us plenty of defensive strength, width down the flanks with the wing backs and it'll also probably allow arteta to venture forwards abit more as the wingbacks will help out more defensively. However, the only draw back is that for this to work effectively, you'll need very durable and skilled wingbacks, sagna is fine(maybe his direct attacking play isn't the best but with his overlapping runs, he will stretch defences and offer width), not too sure about gibbs when it comes to his long term durability. You play santos there and he'll probably cut inside more often then he should and that balance will be lost.
Also, if you play theo upfront with podolski or giroud, it'll mean that gervinho could essentially be walcott's backup, would give wenger his license to experiment as he loves to do but still offer us viable choices. Not too sure where the ox would fit in that formation, wenger has said he sees him as a central player but at this moment, i'm not too sure.
dreamLord said:The Arteta Wilshere Cazorla combo is ****. And we can't factor Diaby into our plans because whether through his fault or just bad luck, he is Diaby.
Cazorla has been pretty poor as an AM too, for whatever reasons. We need a more attacking player in his position, not someone who keeps dropping deep to play tiki taka with his spanish buddy.