• ! ! ! IMPORTANT MESSAGE ! ! !

    Discussions about police investigations

    In light of recent developments about a player from Premier League being arrested and until there is an official announcement, ALL users should refrain from discussing or speculating about situations around personal off-pitch matters related to any Arsenal player. This is to protect you and the forum.

    Users who disregard this reminder will be issued warnings and their posts will get deleted from public.

Is The Premier League Tougher Than It Used To Be?

Is It?


  • Total voters
    151

BergMan

Leverkusen Ultra
That you have to get over 90 points to win the premier league proves it is tougher. In 98 we won the league with 78 points. This team is much better than that 98 team.
 

Rex Stone

Long live the fighters
Trusted ⭐

Country: Wales
My bad ✋ point still stands, that’s the exception to the rule whereas it’s more common in this era

What about guys like Kovacevic, Hasselbaink to Leeds, Asprilla, Jon Dahl Tomasson etc?

All young and highly rated youngsters who went to bang average PL clubs.
 

A_G

Rice Rice Baby 🎼🎵
Moderator
What about guys like Kovacevic, Hasselbaink to Leeds, Asprilla, Jon Dahl Tomasson etc?

All young and highly rated youngsters who went to bang average PL clubs.
How often did clubs make those kinds of signings? Because clubs nowadays can go relatively big every summer.
 

Blood on the Tracks

AG's best friend, role model and mentor.
Trusted ⭐

Country: England

Player:Rice
It was a massive deal when Boro were signing the likes of Juninho, Ravanelli, Emerson etc in the mid 90's.

And It was a big deal because it rarely happened at the time. No-one would blink an eye at those level of players joining a mid table PL team now.

In fact it was relatively rare for PL sides to be signing fairly big name foreign players at all in that era really, especially Brazilians and Italians.
 
Last edited:

Blankety Blank

emoji merchant
It's better now because even really 'poor' teams at the bottom have good players & are capable of playing some decent football.

It pains me to say it but Peps Man City are the best side this Country has seen.
 

Dokaka

AM's resident closet Arsenal fan
Yeah but you’re talking mathematically about something that’s incredibly subject to change?

Poor form and injuries are part of the game.

Which is exactly why I said you could probably see the difference if you ran it back 1000 times in a simulation, but the variance from season to season is too big to make that call definitively right now. We're literally talking about a total sample of less than 30.

Form and injuries are indeed part of the game and that would even out over 1000 seasons, but they're too impactful factors to ignore when the sample size is less than 30.
 

Blood on the Tracks

AG's best friend, role model and mentor.
Trusted ⭐

Country: England

Player:Rice
Anyway it's a pointless debate.

Literally no-one would argue the competitiveness of the league was better in 1980 than it was in 2000. It would be an obviously ridiculous thing to say.

There's no reason not to apply the same logic to 2003 and 2023.

Arsenal fans have nostalgia and want to believe the standard was better when we were at our peak.
 

GDeep™

League is very weak
It was a massive deal when Boro were signing the likes of Juninho, Ravanelli, Emerson etc in the mid 90's.

And It was a big deal because it rarely happened at the time. No-one would blink an eye at those level of players joining a mid table PL team now.

In fact it was relatively rare for PL sides to be signing fairly big name foreign players at all in that era really.
Are we just talking about the mid 90’s? Things changed in the 90’s and later. Sheffield Wednesday were signing Di Canio in 1997. Coventry had Hadji in the late 90’s etc. These aren’t or weren’t even prominent PL clubs.
 

GDeep™

League is very weak
Anyway it's a pointless debate.

Literally no-one would argue the competitiveness of the league was better in 1980 than it was in 2000. It would be an obviously ridiculous thing to say.

There's no reason not to apply the same logic to 2003 and 2023.

Arsenal fans have nostalgia and want to believe the standard was better when we were at our peak.
You have people like Bergman saying this is a better team than ‘98 too.
 

Rex Stone

Long live the fighters
Trusted ⭐

Country: Wales
It was a massive deal when Boro were signing the likes of Juninho, Ravanelli, Emerson etc in the mid 90's.

And It was a big deal because it rarely happened at the time. No-one would blink an eye at those level of players joining a mid table PL team now.

In fact it was relatively rare for PL sides to be signing fairly big name foreign players at all in that era really, especially Brazilians and Italians.

Yeah because of the Bosman rule changing in 1995 as well as other leagues relaxing nationality rules.

It’s not an apples to apples comparison because the transfer market and freedom of movement of 2023 is a whole level up from 1995 when it was introduced.
 

Dokaka

AM's resident closet Arsenal fan
Are we just talking about the mid 90’s? Things changed in the 90’s and later. Sheffield Wednesday were signing Di Canio in 1997. Coventry had Hadji in the late 90’s etc. These aren’t or weren’t even prominent PL clubs.

Di Canio wasn't known for much more than being a ****ing idiot before he joined us, when he upgraded to ****ing idiot but good footballer.
 

Arsenal Quotes

I think without doubt that Bergkamp is the most talented player to have played for Arsenal in the past 30 years, for as long as I can remember

Liam Brady

Daily Transfer Updates

Monday, May 3

Marco Silva is pushing the Fulham board to spend as Arsenal prepare to listen to offers for Emile Smith Rowe, among other fringe players [Evening Standard]

New Fenerbache manager Jose Mourinho is determined to stop Arsenal from signing LB Ferdi Kadıoğlu [TBR Football]

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom