lamby22
It's Not Lupus
Country: Scotland
Played Leicester, Brighton, Sp**s, Burnley, Watford, Wolves and West Ham. Hardly the toughest set of fixtures.
Alexis Sanchez? That the guy who went to Manu to win trophies? Hope he is practising his darts whilst he is not even on the bench.Chilean journalist says Mourinho reprimanded Alexis in training in front of the whole squad before dropping him for the West Ham game Wenger would never...
he's going to become more desperate to get out of United than he ever was hereAlexis Sanchez? That the guy who went to Manu to win trophies? Hope he is practising his darts whilst he is not even on the bench.
Mourinho is a specialist in failure.
he's going to become more desperate to get out of United than he ever was here
I hate saying 'serves him right', but ............ serves him right
No Wenger thoughGlorious this
You just know that they'll take a minimum of four points against us though.
Not a chance they sack him before Christmas. They'd have to pay him £12M
Business masterstroke?
I disagree, Sanchez would be doing as well as Mkhi has for us, had we kept him, at the bare minimum.
Yes, we could not have, but would we not have been better off just selling Sanchez for 35 million to City instead? We never really needed Mkhi, we needed a winger.You are not looking at this properly.
Sanchez had 6 months left in his contract and he demanded something around 350k at the very least, at United he is now getting 433k minimum according to reports, some even taking this up to 500k.
We couldn't have kept him. We replaced him with someone who, no matter how inferior he is, had 2,5 years left on his contract (iirc) and gets paid 140k p/w.
That means: We paid 35m to get 3,5 years out of Sanchez at whatever wage he was before he left (not that high,) AND 4 years of Mkhitaryan at 140k p/w. Man Utd paid 38m to get 1,5 year out of Mkhitaryan at whatever wage he was before he left, AND 4 years out of Sanchez at 433k+ p/w.
Basically what happened is we ripped them off with this swap. We got the best years of a better player at a low sunk cost (wages) and then recouped the last fraction of that investment to have another player in his place. It doesn't matter how inferior he is, he does a job and doesn't cost much. Doing the math, Mkhitaryan cost us less than... 4,5m (!!!) in transfer fee, while Sanchez cost United over 23,5m. That is NOT including wages, and Sanchez is a burden on that front.
I mean... Are you kidding me?
Yes, we could not have, but would we not have been better off just selling Sanchez for 35 million to City instead? We never really needed Mkhi, we needed a winger.
Mind, I don't hate Mkhi, but it's not a masterstroke. We made the best out of a bad situation