What's the point of that? We'll still be carrying his wages whilst losing his talent. No loan club will pay 350K/week.We will be loaning him out till the end of his contract
What's the point of that? We'll still be carrying his wages whilst losing his talent. No loan club will pay 350K/week.We will be loaning him out till the end of his contract
Oh it's ever so reliable Miguel with the word. #Sarcasm.
I don't mind if Emery doesn't like Özil for tactical reasons or whatever. He's the manager and we've lost big players before. I personally think we're going to run into problems trying to keep both Lacazette and Aubemyang happy unless we plan to play two up top but that's for a different thread.
Its the revisionism surrounding Özil that grinds my gears with fans understating his contribution to the club or just downright ignoring how good he has been for us at times.
I'll be honest, outside of Aaron Ramsey, Koscielny and perhaps Cazorla, there isn't a single player out there who has done more for Arsenal Football Club, than Mesut Özil.
It also beggars belief why far inferior players like Xhaka, Iwobi, Cech and Mustafi are defended to the hilt while Özil is criticized to hell and back.
He's a parody of himself at this point but the fact that there's a quote in there leads me to believe that he might have been briefed on this. Logically it makes sense, if you're Emery or the club you'd want a story like this out in the open to insulate yourself from criticism and shift the blame onto the player.
Thats fair enough, he's nowhere near as bad as many make out, on his day is elite but on off days he's invisible, for me the money he is on he should have having a Vieira, Henry, Bergkamp, Cesc impact on this team 3 out of 4 games but that doesnt seem to happen, maybe i'm looking back on the impact of those players with rose tinted glasses and being unfair, or maybe not, i'm not sure
In 2015/16 he directly contributed to 25 goals in 35 premier league appearances. That is pretty much a 3 out of 4 game impact. His productivity did dip to 1.5 out of 4 in the next two seasons to be fair. Vieira, Henry and Bergkamp player in far better teams. As did Fabregas if we're being honest, Cesc had Judas, Adebayor and Henry (for a season or two) to feed. Özil had Olivier Giroud.
Özil has only been on this type of money for the latter half of last season where the entire team was a mess and this season where he has been frozen out after a bright start.
I find it hard to criticize him for not making an impact under Emery when he's hardly player yet has 3 goals and an assist in 11 league appearances. If he was playing every week and doing nothing, I would be right there with you but that isn't the case.
Fair enough, nice to hear someone else's point of view without a tirade of abuse, actually I can see your point yet somehow I still won't be that bothered if he leaves.
That first Sp**s was probably the only time we've looked very good without him. And we were arguably even better vs Liverpool where he played a big part.We played our best game of the season without Özil though?
I don't think we've looked spectacular in too many games with or without Özil, it's been more about grinding results under Emery so far. Özil hasn't been good enough this season but has he been poor enough to warrant not starting games? Probably not. However, I feel like some fans massively overrate Özil and some fans essentially label him as 'not good enough' when in reality he is probably somewhere in between.
We definitely weren't better against Liverpool, Fulham was one our best displays this season and we weren't bad against Bournemouth either.That first Sp**s was probably the only time we've looked very good without him. And we were arguably even better vs Liverpool where he played a big part.
Two of the worst teams in the league there. Look at who we played with him vs not. Two of those losses with Özil were against City and Chelsea at the start of the year.We definitely weren't better against Liverpool, Fulham was one our best displays this season and we weren't bad against Bournemouth either.
We have 5 wins in 7 games without Özil in the league and 5 wins in 10 with him. I'm sure you'll spin it however you like to fit your argument but the fact is there hasn't been too many games where we've been brilliant with Özil in the side with the exception of Leicester/Liverpool.
We definitely weren't better against Liverpool, Fulham was one our best displays this season and we weren't bad against Bournemouth either.
We have 5 wins in 7 games without Özil in the league and 5 wins in 10 with him. I'm sure you'll spin it however you like to fit your argument but the fact is there hasn't been too many games where we've been brilliant with Özil in the side with the exception of Leicester/Liverpool.
Bournemouth are certainly not one of the worst teams in the league and they're a team which have taken points off us regularly since they've been in the league. Does the team always matter anyway? The performance against Fulham was brilliant.Two of the worst teams in the league there. Look at who we played with him vs not. Two of those losses with Özil were against City and Chelsea at the start of the year.
Well the 2nd half v Cardiff where he drove the attack and Newcastle where he scored the winning goal
No the team doesn't always matter. But I really don't see us having had better performances without Özil. A lot of struggle in transition and players making the wrong decisions around the box, the two things he excels at.Bournemouth are certainly not one of the worst teams in the league and they're a team which have taken points off us regularly since they've been in the league. Does the team always matter anyway? The performance against Fulham was brilliant.
We drew against Palace and Wolves with Özil, also struggled past Cardiff & Newcastle and certainly weren't convincing against Watford.