- Thread starter
- #21
potterarsenal
Active Member
'to much of a pro' that should say incase you are :?
-
! ! ! IMPORTANT MESSAGE ! ! !
Discussions about police investigations
In light of recent developments about a player from Premier League being arrested and until there is an official announcement, ALL users should refrain from discussing or speculating about situations around personal off-pitch matters related to any Arsenal player. This is to protect you and the forum.
Users who disregard this reminder will be issued warnings and their posts will get deleted from public.
Ronaldo (the REAL one)
- Thread starter potterarsenal
- Start date
- Replies 35
- Views 2,701
AFCG7
Established Member
Some people's view on infidelity are far more harsh than others.
Agree with jc8gooner to an extent.. however its possible that effects off the field can affect a player mentally
Agree with jc8gooner to an extent.. however its possible that effects off the field can affect a player mentally
JazzG
Established Member
jc8gooner said:
No he isn't, Henry is better than him. Maybe the Ronaldo of 1996-1998 might of been better but this Ronaldo DEFINITELY isn't
AFCG7
Established Member
While Henry is the best striker of all the European countries.. i still say Ronaldo is the best in the world...
at least Henry is close this time.. in 96-98 no one even got close enough to Ronaldo to challenge the kind of form he was in
at least Henry is close this time.. in 96-98 no one even got close enough to Ronaldo to challenge the kind of form he was in
JazzG
Established Member
I have seen Ronaldo many times for R.Madrid, he isn't the same player he once was
Henry right now is the most complete striker in the world. He can score from other peoples assists, he can make his own goals, he can take freekicks with his right and left foot i.e. he is 2 footed, he sets up loads of goals, he works hard for the team and will come and help when we need it.
Once he adds headering and scoring tap ins into his game he will be better than Ronaldo even in his 96-98 form.
Henry right now is the most complete striker in the world. He can score from other peoples assists, he can make his own goals, he can take freekicks with his right and left foot i.e. he is 2 footed, he sets up loads of goals, he works hard for the team and will come and help when we need it.
Once he adds headering and scoring tap ins into his game he will be better than Ronaldo even in his 96-98 form.
Guns and Arses
Active Member
I've seen a photo of him touching an unnamed woman's backside.
Puuks
Member
JazzG said:
His fault for getting caught-
A
Anonymous
Guest
henry..complete striker?sorry mate..have to disagree..his hold up isn't the best...He doesn't have the greatest of volleys either..and his heading isn't all that great.neither does he have the instinct of being in the right place at the right time for tap ins and parried shots.
AFCG7
Established Member
Henry is also a terrific header of the all.. its just that ARsenal's style of play doesnt allow him to get much attacking headers in at goal.. for France he doesnt have any problems heading the ball.
He doesnt do tap ins because he isnt a striker like Van 9.5 .. but he does score from free kicks which Van 9.5 doesnt do.
Van 9.5 isnt a complete striker either.. which is why he isnt the best.
Ronaldo is the best because he can score from any situation.
He doesnt do tap ins because he isnt a striker like Van 9.5 .. but he does score from free kicks which Van 9.5 doesnt do.
Van 9.5 isnt a complete striker either.. which is why he isnt the best.
Ronaldo is the best because he can score from any situation.
tony
Member
IMO Ronaldo isn't even better than Raul, RvN or Vieri, not to mention Henry. He's finishing and is tap ins are worse than Raul's and Rvn's, hes headers are worse than Vieri's and he dont score freekicks like Henry does. Titi's all around play, pace, creativity and assists are better than Ronaldo's. Actually Ronaldo have serious attitude problems-half of the last season he was overweighted and looked like ****ing pink piggy. Last but not least- Ronaldo even dont score more goals than Henry. 8)
A
Anonymous
Guest
AFCG7 said:
but who said that Ruud is the best?!
AFCG7
Established Member
ruud .. what the hell is your problem.. i never referred to anyone saying Van 9.5 is the best ,
I was using Van 9.5 as an example to show what he has that Henry doesnt... and what Henry has and he doesnt ( i excluded the fact that Henry manages to stay on his feet a lot more and doesnt play dirty ) .
Ronaldo has everything it takes to be the world's number 1 striker.
I was using Van 9.5 as an example to show what he has that Henry doesnt... and what Henry has and he doesnt ( i excluded the fact that Henry manages to stay on his feet a lot more and doesnt play dirty ) .
Ronaldo has everything it takes to be the world's number 1 striker.
- Thread starter
- #36
potterarsenal
Active Member
no one said he was the best i think he is good if v. nistilrooy and henry were up front together there would be so many goals not to mention penalties!! only joking ruud is a good striker 
