Come on you knew it had to be me
Bastard
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Come on you knew it had to be me
He is drifting more of late anyway, but look at the passes he makes from that side.
You haven’t met my good brother @GDeep™ have you?Universally well like too no? Can’t see any reason beside pure merchantry for people to dislike him
The RCM vs LCM debate is irrelevant. Next season, one of Bruno G or João Neves will be starting games, meaning Ødegaard will be given a free role. It never sat right with me how Zinchenko was given the free role when he is not that important to our team in the long run.He is drifting more of late anyway, but look at the passes he makes from that side.
We been linked with Neves? Don’t get me gassed!?The RCM vs LCM debate is irrelevant. Next season, one of Bruno G or João Neves will be starting games, meaning Ødegaard will be given a free role. It never sat right with me how Zinchenko was given the free role when he is not that important to our team in the long run.
We been linked with Neves? Don’t get me gassed!?
Onana is a bumm.
TNAT Patreon piece said so. Notice how I left out Onana in my previous post because I don’t want that brother at my club.
From Eastern Norway, minus points right there.Universally well like too no? Can’t see any reason beside pure merchantry for people to dislike him
TNAT Patreon piece said so. Notice how I left out Onana in my previous post because I don’t want that brother at my club.
Dyche telling the Everton board to sell Onana: “I’m not racist but…”Guessing you and Dyche don't want him for different reasons though
Neves would be so so good. Especially if we keep Partey and Jorginho, gives him time to settle. What are your thoughts on Bruno for 80m?
Dyche telling the Everton board to sell Onana: “I’m not racist but…”
I’m selling Partey regardless of who we bring in the summer. We have played this game enough times to know how it ends. As for Bruno for £80M, I’m all for it. I think he can go up a level surrounded with better players and a top coach to develop him. However, he’ll be 27 in November, and similarly to Rice, his game is based on his superb athleticism. You're looking at around 5/6 years of service before his legs go. Couple that with Rice getting older, and that will leave us replacing our two starting midfielders at the same time which isn't ideal. I would much rather sign Neves, who I believe is equally if not more talented than Bruno, and will give us 10+ years of service or a healthy sale fee.
Neves is good enough to make an impact right now. I believe in his talent. He's that Kroos/Scholes/Alonso type of midfielder that we've missed for years.Difficult isn’t it. Long term Neves would be the choice. But are we at a point where we need to be thinking more short term? Trophies are needed now to back up the performances. As much as a dislike Bruno, he makes more sense from that perspective. 80m still seems a lot though.
Feel like Jorginho and Partey are better than all these guys but what do I know? (A lot but I’m being humble).
TNAT Patreon piece said so. Notice how I left out Onana in my previous post because I don’t want that brother at my club.
@GDeep™Didn't picture GDeep Eastern European...
The best arsenal buy in decadesWhat do you get for £35m these days? One of Edu's better buys.
What do you dislike about Bruno? I’m not 100% on him, not really sure what his special qualities are.Difficult isn’t it. Long term Neves would be the choice. But are we at a point where we need to be thinking more short term? Trophies are needed now to back up the performances. As much as a dislike Bruno, he makes more sense from that perspective. 80m still seems a lot though.
Blonde hair will always have its detractors.Universally well like too no? Can’t see any reason beside pure merchantry for people to dislike him