Butland mentioned as a goalkeeper option being explored.
Maybe Szcz will get sold and we'll use that money, plus the Ospina money, to fund a new GK.Not buying it. Cech will be here, and we'll still have Szcz and MartineZ.
Maybe Szcz will get sold and we'll use that money, plus the Ospina money, to fund a new GK.
Maybe Szcz will get sold and we'll use that money, plus the Ospina money, to fund a new GK.
Those numbers don't look very promising...For what it's worth, the Sun claims Arsenal will rival Liverpool for Butland this summer.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/5548464/liverpool-jurgen-klopp-stoke-arsenal-jack-butland/
Those numbers don't look very promising...
Well there pretty irrelevant numbers given there is no context to them. Not saying Butland is the answer to GK problem but those stats certainly aren't going to prove that to be the case one way or the other.
Will likely head to the world cup as England's number 1. Stoke will demand upwards of £40M for him. Personally I don't think he's worth that and we would have better options.
I'd also have Pickford as number first choice, but get a strong feeling it'll be Butland. I'd also have Pickford at Arsenal over Butland.I'd have Pickford over Butland as England no. 1. I don't quite see what Butland has done since he came back from his injury to prove he's better than Pickford. He's been ok, but I don't get the impression he's doing anything special.
Anyway, 40m for Butland would be pure insanity. If Oblak is attainable for 50-60m that would be much better value for money.
Anything around the £40M mark is scandalous for him, I would rather see us paying Oblak's full release clause than spending half of it on Butland.