DJ_Markstar
Based and Artetapilled
Player:Martinelli
Here is an article as proof of the money. Do you agree that when you have more money, you can buy better players? Do you agree better players make better teams? Do you agree better teams in a league make the league tougher?
Also in Premier League there is a clear top 6, in other league's there is like top 2-3. This means tougher league.
And as we have seen in this window, smaller clubs ask ridiculous prices for players, because they can and don't want to risk dropping from the league to worse money.
"The Premier League’s 20 clubs made record revenues of £4.827bn in 2017‑18, paying total wages of £2.8bn, the Guardian’s annual analysis of the clubs’ most recently published annual accounts has revealed.
Their combined income, in the second year of the league’s £8.4bn TV deals from 2016-19, confirms the Premier League’s financial dominance over all other leagues in Europe, which has underpinned four of its clubs claiming all the places in next week’s finals of the Champions and Europa League.
Spain’s La Liga declared this month record combined revenues of €4.48bn (£3.86bn), for all 42 clubs in its two divisions for 2017-18, almost £1bn less than the Premier League’s alone. The German Bundesliga announced similar record revenues, €4.42bn (£3.88bn) for all 36 clubs in its two divisions."
https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...d-48bn-revenues-widens-gap-la-liga-bundesliga
All you've proven is that the league generates more in revenue. I don't necessarily agree that more money = better and/or tougher, I think this is something you'd have to prove rather than just asserting it.
I feel like there's a number of variables that could affect this, but sure if you think more money = tougher league then have at it. It might be the case, but it might not be as well.
Perhaps define terms first - how do you define "tough" in the context of a league?
Last edited: