Tomb Bombadil
Active Member
Hard to rate. Could be a 1 in a few years but also could be an 9 by then. But if it's not over a 5 in retrospect we are ****ed for the next 5 years.
Pro's | Cons |
Managed to buy a young starting RB | Only (temporarily) got rid of 1 of 3 inadequate RB's |
Managed to get a back-up GK | Spent way too much on the back-up GK |
Improved at CB with a young promising signing | Spent 50m on the improvement instead of fixing it internally whilst saving money for other needs |
Got a young promising back-up CM in for a decent sum | Failed to buy a (marquee) starter CM to partner with Partey |
Managed to buy a creative CM for a decent price | Failed to sell Xhaka while haggling over 1-2m and subsequently bumpered his contract that was already making him unsellable (!) |
Bought a back-up LB for a small-ish sum | Failed to get a fee for Nketiah who is now walking out the door for free by haggling too long (!) |
Managed to get rid of Willian without buying out his contract (a first for Edu) | Failed to get a fee for all of our players bar a record setting HG midfielder |
Now short in midfield whilst selling a talented CM | |
Absolutely atrocious handling of AMN on a human and business level (let's hope he can now slot in a midfield position) | |
Elneny is still here | |
Kolasinac is still here | |
Chambers is still here (and walking out the door for free) | |
Soares is still here | |
Lacazette is still here (and walking out the door for free) | |
Arteta and Edu still here (!) |
2 - We’ve blown our budget on home insurance while sleeping under a leaking roof. Spent £150m to stay in exactly the same place.
The fact it’s debatable that he’s better than somebody we already have but we’ve spent 50M is exactly why it’s a poor signing.Exactly why you can’t say he’s a poor signing. It’s very debatable.