Wilfried Zaha

[Jasard]

Hang on did Sky actually break some news first??

 

[gunnergoa]

It's so pointless comparing Fekir and Zaha statistically. Zaha plays for a team outside the top 6 in the strongest league in the world. Fekir plays for a top team in France in a league that PSG walk.

You need to use your eyes with Zaha. It's less about statistics. Do you buy a physical beast who is fully adapted to England, knows every ground, has something to prove, is a gooner, is home grown and who demands the all and has the ability to carry a mid table teams offense vs the top 6. Someone who is clearly the best player outside the top 6.

Or do you buy someone who the Champions League holders were seriously interested in but decided a against it based on medical grounds. a club who medically are one of the most advanced in the world. That's all you need to know. You don't need to go into Fekirs ability.

It's a no brainer. Zaha over Fekir any day.

With that logic we should have bought Lukaku instead of Lacazatte

 

[field442]

Some of the responses to that “£30m + Chambers”, “Give them Chambers (£20m) + Jenkinson (£5m) + £20-25m cash”. Glad they aren’t our negotiators.

 

[gunnergoa]

It's so pointless comparing Fekir and Zaha statistically. Zaha plays for a team outside the top 6 in the strongest league in the world. Fekir plays for a top team in France in a league that PSG walk.

You need to use your eyes with Zaha. It's less about statistics. Do you buy a physical beast who is fully adapted to England, knows every ground, has something to prove, is a gooner, is home grown and who demands the all and has the ability to carry a mid table teams offense vs the top 6. Someone who is clearly the best player outside the top 6.

Or do you buy someone who the Champions League holders were seriously interested in but decided a against it based on medical grounds. a club who medically are one of the most advanced in the world. That's all you need to know. You don't need to go into Fekirs ability.

It's a no brainer. Zaha over Fekir any day.

Don't get me wrong if Zaha I available for 40 mill then hell yeah. But 120 mill no way Zaha will cost more to kroenke than his ranch.

 

[Gn1212]

It's so pointless comparing Fekir and Zaha statistically. Zaha plays for a team outside the top 6 in the strongest league in the world. Fekir plays for a top team in France in a league that PSG walk.

You need to use your eyes with Zaha. It's less about statistics. Do you buy a physical beast who is fully adapted to England, knows every ground, has something to prove, is a gooner, is home grown and who demands the all and has the ability to carry a mid table teams offense vs the top 6. Someone who is clearly the best player outside the top 6.

Or do you buy someone who the Champions League holders were seriously interested in but decided a against it based on medical grounds. a club who medically are one of the most advanced in the world. That's all you need to know. You don't need to go into Fekirs ability.

It's a no brainer. Zaha over Fekir any day.

Game, set, match.

 

[DanDare]

Hang on did Sky actually break some news first??

Yeah I think his agent went directly to them. Kaveh didn't actually do any journalistic work

 

[Sammy1887]

Anything over 40m and its a day light robbery. He is not worth the hassle for the reported price. His figures are mediocre and has absolutely no European experience. I'd rather give chance to Nelson/Saka/Amaechi.

People crying out for Zaha will be the first ones to dismiss him when he takes a few additional touches and loses the ball.

 

[Mitch]

It's so pointless comparing Fekir and Zaha statistically. Zaha plays for a team outside the top 6 in the strongest league in the world. Fekir plays for a top team in France in a league that PSG walk.

You need to use your eyes with Zaha. It's less about statistics. Do you buy a physical beast who is fully adapted to England, knows every ground, has something to prove, is a gooner, is home grown and who demands the all and has the ability to carry a mid table teams offense vs the top 6. Someone who is clearly the best player outside the top 6.

Or do you buy someone who the Champions League holders were seriously interested in but decided a against it based on medical grounds. a club who medically are one of the most advanced in the world. That's all you need to know. You don't need to go into Fekirs ability.

It's a no brainer. Zaha over Fekir any day.

Clearly best player outside the top 6? Disagree with that:

Fraser - had more of an impressive season.

Brooks - the most skilled player outside the top 6 with the greatest potential.

You can also make a case for the likes of Anderson, Richarlison, Maguire and Neves.

 

[field442]

Anything over 40m and its a day light robbery. He is not worth the hassle for the reported price. His figures are mediocre and has absolutely no European experience. I'd rather give chance to Saka/Amaechi.

People crying out for Zaha will be the first ones to dismiss him when he takes a few additional touches and loses the ball.

He’s probably have a lot better stats if he was playing Bosnian farmers every Thursday.

 

[Yousif Arsenal]

Can't believe people post an article by that c**t Ashton the guy is massive ***** he hate Arsenal and wenger ended him in one of his press conference

 

[Highbury_2006]

He apparently is the most fouled player in Premier League (excluding Hazard) in the last 5 years.

 

[Highbury_2006]

He’s probably have a lot better stats if he was playing Bosnian farmers every Thursday.

Or croatian dishwashers.

 

[dashsnow17]

60m tops for Zaha, Palace are just blowing hot air talking about 80-100m. They know full well that Zaha has done his time there and will be unhappy if he doesn't get a move this summer. They'll budge eventually. Whether we can actually afford to go to 60m is another matter though, gonna need at least one significant sale.

 

[Taylor Gang Gunners]

@GDeep™ ’s turned mate, given over to the dark side.

Me and Garrincha stood strong in the face of dogs abuse from the likes of @Taylor Gang Gunners

At that time he was nothing but a step over merchant, a rich man’s Bolasie if you will. He’s improved yes- £70M upward worth of improvement, I’m not so sure.

Miyachi, ffs. Good job his 1989 album came along to distract everyone from that comment.

It’s hilarious how much you rate Taylor Swift despite getting onto me about her. Noute wrong with going against the grain lad. Your masculinity will remain intact.

Miyaichi . He looked awesome for Bolton.

 

[Highbury_2006]

At that time he was nothing but a step over merchant, a rich man’s Bolasie if you will. He’s improved yes- £70M upward worth of improvement, I’m not so sure.



It’s hilarious how much you rate Taylor Swift despite getting onto me about her. Noute wrong with going against the grain lad. Your masculinity will remain intact.

Miyaichi . He looked awesome for Bolton.

And Feyenoord. Apparently he is playing in Bundesliga 2 nowadays.

 

[Poldma]

Really think Zaha would bring the best out of Mustafi. Two less games in a season where he’d get absolutely terrorised.

Jokes aside, I believe buying Zaha might make our defense better. Put yourself in a situation, where you train against Iwobi and Mkhitaryan 3-4 times a week and suddenly on the weekend you come aginst a player like Zaha. You would have no idea what you are supposed to do, but when you train against a tricky winger week in week out, you could learn how to play against someone like him.

 

[gunnergoa]

That is exactly what my problem is would I want Zaha yes ..for 120 mills no way.

 

[Highbury_2006]

That is exactly what my problem is would I want Zaha yes ..for 120 mills no way.

We will not pay 120 mills.

 

[Sammy1887]

He’s probably have a lot better stats if he was playing Bosnian farmers every Thursday.

Might be but you are not going to pay 50m + for him to score against bosnian farmers.

 

[Yousif Arsenal]

Most crystal palace fans don't think this will drag on until deadline day because they'll want replacement as quick ad possible