Keplaz
Well-Known Member
My reasons for not wanting him, have nothing to do with football. He seems like an Emi Martinez level bastard. That is all.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The thing is, players like Martinez or Guimaraes seem to have a huge hunger to succeed. Neither seem to be like that off the field. Take a look at some of Guimaraes interviews, seems a good bloke to me. These players are also a bit like Xhaka, and you want some players like that in the squad.My reasons for not wanting him, have nothing to do with football. He seems like an Emi Martinez level bastard. That is all.
Do you like Ben White? Because he’s a bit of a prick too. Will do cheeky ****houze stuff all the time. But he’s our prickMy reasons for not wanting him, have nothing to do with football. He seems like an Emi Martinez level bastard. That is all.
He is not DMF. Longstaff is Newcastle DMFHe is faster and younger than Jorginho.
Guimaraes is the only DMF on this list...
Okay, do you have anything to back it up that these are the clear positions for them? If you look at the heatmaps at Sofascore, Bruno has been all over the field, but Longstaff has been higher up also.He is not DMF. Longstaff is Newcastle DMF
He is not DMF. Longstaff is Newcastle DMF
Bruno sitting as a 6 is waste of his strength. He is at his best when he has freedom to roam. We already seen Rice as a 6 he is not great on the ball and our general play suffers with him there. This screams awful lot of money to just create issuesOkay, do you have anything to back it up that these are the clear positions for them? If you look at the heatmaps at Sofascore, Bruno has been all over the field, but Longstaff has been higher up also.
It doesn't matter much anyway as Bruno is the only DMF/CMF in that list, which was my point. He is in good company in that list, being a more defensive midfielder.
And either Rice or Bruno can play the DMF position. It's possible Arteta plans to use Bruno at LCM more also, because he is better creatively and both have great stamina to press. I think he might be needed in build up, but this might depend on the opponent, like it has with Jorginho occasionally.
Bruno Guimarães stats and ratings | Sofascore
Bruno Guimarães profile player page. Goals, matches, stats, player ratings and more.www.sofascore.comSean Longstaff stats and ratings | Sofascore
Sean Longstaff profile player page. Goals, matches, stats, player ratings and more.www.sofascore.com
Rice was the Xhaka replacement last summer for LCM. Bruno is the Partey replacement. The line-up where there is a DMF & CMF & Ødegaard has worked very well in the past two seasons.Bruno sitting as a 6 is waste of his strength. He is at his best when he has freedom to roam. We already seen Rice as a 6 he is not great on the ball and our general play suffers with him there. This screams awful lot of money to just create issues
He is faster and younger than Jorginho.
Guimaraes is the only DMF on this list...
Yeah let’s pretend havertz was not bought for midfield and after failing there he was moved upfrontRice was the Xhaka replacement last summer for LCM. Bruno is the Partey replacement. The line-up where there is a DMF & CMF & Ødegaard has worked very well in the past two seasons.
Where is the waste of money and creating issues? It's only solving issues long-term.
And yes, no proof for your claims either. Take a look at Dokaka's post above.
You're such a great debater, I'm in awe. Keep on ignoring the topics where you have no counter arguments.Yeah let’s pretend havertz was not bought for midfield and after failing there he was moved upfront
Who is this about?Yes but did you see Eddies interview and when he told him we need you coming days, stay out of trouble and he said I will. Eddie said yeah sure and basically said he didn’t think he could
Bruno sitting as a 6 is waste of his strength. He is at his best when he has freedom to roam. We already seen Rice as a 6 he is not great on the ball and our general play suffers with him there. This screams awful lot of money to just create issues
I’m at the place where I prefer Rice as 8 rather than 6. I think you need better ball distribution from your 6 than what Rice offers. My only issue with Bruno is he is slow as a snail.This really is an awful take.
Bruno is a DMF. He is much much better on the ball than Rice.
The reason we are looking at him in the first place is to offset Rices passing issue.
You seem to have made up your mind on the players and are now trying to find reasons.
I’m at the place where I prefer Rice as 8 rather than 6. I think you need better ball distribution from your 6 than what Rice offers. My only issue with Bruno is he is slow as a snail.
I’m at the place where I prefer Rice as 8 rather than 6. I think you need better ball distribution from your 6 than what Rice offers. My only issue with Bruno is he is slow as a snail.
Bruno sitting as a 6 is waste of his strength. He is at his best when he has freedom to roam. We already seen Rice as a 6 he is not great on the ball and our general play suffers with him there. This screams awful lot of money to just create issues