Malky
Established Member
Pretty obvious that the entire football world will be hoping Dortmund knock these ****s out the CL.
I'm interested to know where money is coming from some of people money coming from Middle east they have made investment in Chelsea via some bank forgot the name. Because I'm totally sure even if todd worth 5B like forbes saying he not gonna go crazy like that. American owners aren't like that.
So kindly need explanation where the money coming from? Saudi Arabia? Qatar? UAE? Stop fooling me.
Why the leave our boy Pepe off the list then?
It's crazy how only one of these transfers has actually been anywhere near worth it.
They're convinced they'll sign him in the summer, no doubt on some dodgy 7 year contract.
Havertz?!F*ck sake man they spent 71m on one of Germany’s best young players just 2.5 years ago, a guy who’s still 23 and extremely good, and they’re ready to throw him on the scrap heap already.
Yeah it’s *. Amortisation isn’t a “loophole” - it’s just using up all your future transfer budget today. They’ve locked up all their transfer money for the next 5 years. If some of their players don’t work out, and let’s be honest, they won’t, then they’re foooked.This is going to send Chelsea into receivership or massive firesale and new owners
Agree completely.Im calling it now folks.
I rate Potter, he is a good coach. But I think Boehly the circus clown wont give him enough time to bring it all together.
I actually don't think he's that bad. He just plays in a **** Chelsea team and system. His finishing might be suspect at times but his overall game is good. He's quick, strong, holds the ball up well, works hard. He'd probably look a much better player in a different team and system.Havertz?!
Havertz?!
You said “extremely good”.Havertz is a good player
I doubt that. Salah and De Bruyne were punts on young players in a squad where their positions were already filled and the team was doing well. I think this Chelsea will look to offload the players they currently have in those positions to open them up for the newcomers. They've already started doing it, Jorginho has left to accommodate Enzo, Ziyech would've left had they not screwed up the paperwork to make way for Madueke, etc. I highly doubt they're making people like Pulisic, Hudson-Odoi, Broja etc. a part of their long-term plans.Just like Salah, De Bruyne in the past. Most of them will be loaned out and sold in some years. I hope they explode. Even my best-mate who supported Chelsea is ashamed.
It’s Chelsea, are you surprised?F*ck sake man they spent 71m on one of Germany’s best young players just 2.5 years ago, a guy who’s still 23 and extremely good, and they’re ready to throw him on the scrap heap already.
You said “extremely good”.
And who will replace him?It’s Chelsea, are you surprised?
All their new signings will get the same treatment. I mean they’re already calling Mudryk the new Hazard, if he doesn’t deliver then they’ll want him gone.
They probably won't retain Félix when Nkunku comes in, or they'll try to use him as a RW instead. They're looking to make Havertz into a false nine, which can be done, but requires goalscorers on the wings. So far it hasn't worked so they'll have high expectations from Mudryk in that regard.He is extremely good. For some reason he plays as a CF at Chelsea despite not being a CF. He’s an AM. He’s a very good player.
Reason why Nkunku deal makes no sense to me cos he’s exactly the same type of player as Havertz, you don’t need both Havertz and Nkunku, and Felix ffs.
He only has two years left on his deal so they’ll probably cash in during the summer window.He is extremely good. For some reason he plays as a CF at Chelsea despite not being a CF. He’s an AM. He’s a very good player.
Reason why Nkunku deal makes no sense to me cos he’s exactly the same type of player as Havertz, you don’t need both Havertz and Nkunku, and Felix ffs.