say yes
forum master baiter
GDeep 

A guide (if such a thing can be produced reliably) might help, but given the sheer amount of threads started here that can't follow a simple thread-index and bump (or PM) system, then you've got, give or take 0.0%, 0% of this making a difference. Sorry, but them's the facts. For what it's worth, there were a few of these noble attempts when I cleaned this section up, sad and disused every one of them. See, here's the kicker: you can't legislate against dumb and the insatiability that exists for transfer rumours. :wink:Toast said:The problem is partly the sources printing ****, but mainly it's people not being able to distinguish what's **** information from what's possibly true, thus leading to pointless speculation and false hope. A guide will help.
AnthonyG said:A guide (if such a thing can be produced reliably) might help, but given the sheer amount of threads started here that can't follow a simple thread-index and bump (or PM) system, then you've got, give or take 0.0%, 0% of this making a difference. Sorry, but them's the facts. For what it's worth, there were a few of these noble attempts when I cleaned this section up, sad and disused every one of them. See, here's the kicker: you can't legislate against dumb and the insatiability that exists for transfer rumours. :wink:Toast said:The problem is partly the sources printing ****, but mainly it's people not being able to distinguish what's **** information from what's possibly true, thus leading to pointless speculation and false hope. A guide will help.
But, be my guest and godspeed. (I'll be sure put this poor soul out of its misery when it sinks to p22 or so).
KY said:whatever happened to this guy?
![]()
was pretty reliable in his day...
Bannable offence if you post these sources:Based on the stats from the website supplied by CurryFlavoured (for which thanks), I've taken the liberty of drawing up an initial list. Please not that EVERYTHING is up for debate. The whole point of this exercise is to arrive at a reasonably accurate index and the best way to do so is through debate. It's a small start, but I'm sure there's much more to add.
So let me know what you think. Do you think a source should be in a different category? Are the categories wrong? Do you have information to add? Argue your case below. When adding non-British sources please state how you know they are reliable. In this case I've added Dutch sources since I'm quite familiar with them, being Dutch myself.
Dutch sources
Reliable
Voetbal International
De Telegraaf (regarding Ajax players)
Eindhovens Dagblad (regarding PSV players)
Tubantia (regarding FC Twente players)
British Sources
Extremely reliable
BBC / Honigstein
Arsenal.com
Fairly reliable – they get a third of the rumours right.
The Times
Somewhat reliable – they call between 25-30% of rumours correctly.
Daily Telegraph
The Guardian
The Herald
The Independent
The Scotsman
Somewhat unreliable – they get less than a quarter of rumours right.
The Sun
Daily Mail
Daily Mirror
Daily Star
The Express
Unreliable – they get some things right, but don’t get your hopes up.
Metro
The People
News of the World
Very unreliable – basically fiction
Caught Offside
Talk Sport
Footy Latest
Bleacher Report
Sports Direct News
Goal.com
French sources
German sources
Spanish sources
Italian sources
Twitter sources
Bannable offence if you post these sources:
Tancredi Palmeri
indykalia
Emanuele Giulianelli
Agent Edward
Daily Express
The Sun
Fkhanage
Good point, forgot about Memz. Throw Jeinny Lizarazo in there as well.
Got to be kidding. I'm checking her Twitter on a daily basis.
But do you ever notice what she tweets?
Bannable offence if you post these sources:
Tancredi Palmeri
indykalia
Emanuele Giulianelli
Agent Edward
Daily Express
The Sun
Fkhanage
Jamie f*cking Sanderson as well.
![]()
You serious? this man ? He bases his livelyhood on integrity alone
![]()