GDeep™
League is very weak
Maybe they want both? Maybe they know Raphina is holding out for Barcelona.Why are Chelsea bidding 65 million for Raphinha and then going for Richarlison?
Maybe they want both? Maybe they know Raphina is holding out for Barcelona.Why are Chelsea bidding 65 million for Raphinha and then going for Richarlison?
Yeah things are messy there Mina is thier best cb Allan probably best CM all will be sold. Surprised no DCL.
Just read the forum when they sign somebody.Yeah, but you didn't answer where you see all the Le Grove types who **** on their overall business.
Davies can do a job in 3 ATB LCB, but isn't a starter there for top teams. They need a Pau Torres or someone, but are loaning Lenglet by the looks of it. Good option for cheap but temporary and risky.
It’s not 60M though. He’s 25, his end product will rise playing with Son, Kane etc. Before he was playing with Alex Iwobi.£60m for a chicken-dancing-low-goal return diving **** is getting fleeced with your pants down
Still I love if Tottenham grabs Richarlison for big money ahead of Chelsea if Chelsea get duped by Raphinha for Barcelona. Both have two years in contract so are okay deals in that sense in the market.£60m for a chicken-dancing-low-goal return diving **** is getting fleeced with your pants down
Still chance to change career to modeling.He'll be playing Rapunzel as the club's new mascot. The tower on their badge is suitable for his character
Okay, overall forum does it. Well it's natural for Arsenal fans, and shouldn't be done over the top. Credit where is due, they're planning well having all those debts.Just read the forum when they sign somebody.
Suddenly those players are average and don’t move the needle.
This is why you set smokescreens. Arsenal are competing for Raphinha BOOM Olise or Neto to Arsenal out of nowhere.Dream scenario wouldve been, they hijack Richarlison bc of Barcas hijack on Raphinha, and Barca cant come up with the money for Raphinha after all...
Now tho, Chelsea will probably fancy our next target too
According to @Riou he isn’t even better than Overmars.
Feels like this forum is full of LeGrove types now. Just constantly supporting anything Arsenal do whilst also pretending Sp**s are making terrible decisions when they’re clearly not.
They’ve got an elite setup and it’s ****ing worrying that they’ve gone 6 years finishing above us.
Really drop the Neto even from your dreams. 5 years in contract and we pissed off Wolves with Marquinhos. Will cost like 120 million, we don't have that kind of money for a winger, but 50 million or so.This is why you set smokescreens. Arsenal are competing for Raphinha BOOM Olise or Neto to Arsenal out of nowhere.
One can dream.
Because everything they’re doing makes perfect sense.At the same time you have guys like yourself bigging up everything they are doing.
It's an Arsenal forum mate, it's our duty to have a go and question everything about Sp**s. If you are looking for universal praise for them you'd be in the wrong place.
However, they are doing some ok business and making some decent signings, but so will Chelsea, City, Man Utd, ourselves etc. Let's just see how it all plays out. Worst comes to the worst, we flip, they do great and half the forum gets its wish anyway of the manager getting sacked.
You wanted Richarlison at Arsenal? I remember you saying you liked he was strong in the air.Still I love if Tottenham grabs Richarlison for big money ahead of Chelsea if Chelsea get duped by Raphinha for Barcelona. Both have two years in contract so are okay deals in that sense in the market.
Feels like this forum is full of LeGrove types now. Just constantly supporting anything Arsenal do whilst also pretending Sp**s are making terrible decisions when they’re clearly not.
They’ve got an elite setup and it’s ****ing worrying that they’ve gone 6 years finishing above us.
Again you remember wrong. I wanted Raphinha over Richarlison and voted for it too.You wanted Richarlison at Arsenal? I remember you saying you liked he was strong in the air.
We would’ve had to pay a high fee for him and you would’ve been happy i guess.
Too much like Martinelli for me too, so we agree.Again you remember wrong. I wanted Raphinha over Richarlison and voted for it too.
I said Richarlison would make sense because I want more striker cover. And that he can be a target for long balls when we have Jesus and Saka.
But Richarlison doesn't make so much sense for us as he is LW like Martinelli and ESR.
We want someone who can play RW well, but also good at LW. That's not Richarlison.
I also said I don't like his personality, can make ugly tackles and lose concentration. And is not so good at build up as Raphinha.
Of course I would take Richarlison at Arsenal, but he is too much like Martinelli and the same side.
Perisic would be terrible for us and I’ve never rated him. Conte knows he’ll fit his system and provide good cover though.Really? Seems like the exact opposite to me.
I remember when we tried to get a 29 year old Perisic on loan in January, literally everyone on here said we were a laughing stock and Emery was a clown.
Conte buys a 33 year old Perisic and it’s a masterstroke.
I’m pretty certain that if Sp**s had got Jesus for £45m and we bought Richarlison for £60m people would be moaning like mad.
’Oh look Conte buys a serial winner and proven big game player while Arteta goes back to Everton and gets some ugly, miserable, diving c*nt who nearly got relegated, for more money!’
And I say this as someone who doesn’t particularly like our manager, owner, technical director or players.
Martinelli much more likable and not an asshole on the pitch eventhough aggressive. Much younger too. Just not as tall or big.Too much like Martinelli for me too, so we agree.