sabret00the
Established Member
Diaby isn't a DM, that hasn't changed. He's stood in and done the job without complaint and that should be commended.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I didn't think there was much in it either, until I watched the game again, paying very close attention.Burnwinter said:You're on a massive anti-Diaby binge at the moment Ricky. I know he takes a while to release the ball and doesn't always make the best decisions, but what did he do to deserve a rating two lower than Wilshere?ricky1985 said:Diaby - 6. Good goal, little else.
Wilshere - 8. Passed impeccably, tackled well, pressed prodigiously, and made some great forward runs. Little genius.
I'd love nothing more, mate. I just think it's extremely unlikely, and in the meanwhile his concentration lapses and the deficiencies in his game are/will really cost us.Burnwinter said:Fair enough Ricky, I haven't re-watched the match intently (don't have a static copy of it), so I'll defer to your intensive research on the subject. But I'll be keeping my eye out.
I'm probably overcompensating a little for Abou in the sphere of opinion, because I'd really like to see him continue to improve and become a key player for us.
sabret00the said:Diaby isn't a DM, that hasn't changed. He's stood in and done the job without complaint and that should be commended.
celestis said:Diaby has had virtually no pre- season give the guy a break . He has done well enough in the last two games .
He'll get better I don't have a doubt about that .
I don't like this blame game rubbish but fact is Diaby hasn't cost us but Wilshere has . I don't hear anyone going on and on about that and rightly so , so cut Diaby some slack about something that might happen in the future .
Clutching at straws as far as that specific error is concerned. You might as well make up a similar argument to excuse Diaby's faults at Birmingham.Anzac said:Perhaps if Wilshere didn't need to be so deep to compensate the error may not have happened?