14Henry
Looking for receipts 👀
You already did, plus took the time to reply you didn't to look cool. Its a forum pal. There's no street cred to be won hereIm not gonna read all that.
You already did, plus took the time to reply you didn't to look cool. Its a forum pal. There's no street cred to be won hereIm not gonna read all that.
City can rebuild haaland. They have the technology.
City can rebuild haaland. They have the technology.
Tbh Haaland already looks and plays like half machine.
01-02 and 97-98 were our best teams of the Wenger era imo.Our best ever team was the 01-02 one, some ridiculous football that season and so many top players either at their peak for us or close to it.
Unbelievable squad that.
Why would you rate this above our 03-04 side?01-02 and 97-98 were our best teams of the Wenger era imo.
Both should have won back to back league titles, especially the 01-02 side. We were the best team in the league in 02-03 and the last 10 games and bloody Viduka did us. We had an 8 point gap at one stage if memory serves me correctly.
How could you forget Alex ManningerI'm looking forward to who's our last 'joker' in the pack.
It's a feature of our last major wins.
A Freddie Ljungberg, A Ray Parlour. Someone who from nowhere just catches fire in the last 10ish games and drags us over the line.
I'm putting my money on ESR.
I dunno the squad in 97/98 wasn't the best, the first Arsenal match I ever went to was versus Palace in 97 and this was our lineup01-02 and 97-98 were our best teams of the Wenger era imo.
Both should have won back to back league titles, especially the 01-02 side. We were the best team in the league in 02-03 and the last 10 games and bloody Viduka did us. We had an 8 point gap at one stage if memory serves me correctly.
It’s a matter of personal preference more than anything. Just felt the football those two teams played was just more riskier in comparison to the Invincibles. Henry was slightly before his prime in 2002 (still amazing) but Pires was just sublime until his season was cruelly cut short by injury. I don’t think we lost a single away game that season too.Why would you rate this above our 03-04 side?
Squad-wise, we were very limited at our CB-positions as TA6 was injured for a vast part of the season. Additionally, Vieira did not really have a midfield partner. Ray Parlour did a great job towards the end of the season though.
With the arrival of Touré and Gilberto in 2002 and Reyes in 2004, I would argue that we had a better team in 04, including a prime Edu who still had a lot to learn in 01-02.
The point tally and lack of defeats would confirm this too!
It’s a matter of personal preference more than anything. Just felt the football those two teams played was just more riskier in comparison to the Invincibles. Henry was slightly before his prime in 2002 (still amazing) but Pires was just sublime until his season was cruelly cut short by injury. I don’t think we lost a single away game that season too.
97/98 I was a bit on the young side but just remembered how much of a powerful side we were back to front. Hard as nails defence, the best midfield in the country and Anelka causing havoc up front.
The Invicibles were a great great side but I felt were slightly risk averse as the season wore on ( completely understandable). I always feel the defeat to Chelsea in the CL that season really coloured my feelings on that team overall (regardless of the incredible record that they achieved) which is a shame.
Haalands scored like 41% of all City's PL goals this season. Obviously they CAN score from anywhere but they aren't as evenly spread out as us in terms of goals.Is it really going to hamper them?
Like us, they get goals from all across the pitch. Were it United, I'd say that would signal their surrender of that "all but certain" top 4 spot considering Rashford is dragging them over the line despite their efforts
Pool should get something imo, city has won one match in the last 6 vs pool,
Pool have 3w-2d-1L
What's their record like at the Etihad though? I feel like most of Liverpool's W's vs City are at Anfield.
If they just drew I'd be so happyWhat's their record like at the Etihad though? I feel like most of Liverpool's W's vs City are at Anfield.
If they just drew I'd be so happy