Not if the major shareholder is Stan Kroenke and his only ambition is to make a massive profit out of a "soccer" team :wink:Pea-Tear-Griffin said:Out:
RVP 25million
Walcott(potentially) 20million
Arshavin 7million
Park 3million
Bendtner 8million
Chamack 6million
Squillachi Released
In:
Jovetic 20million
Ben Arfa 18 million
Sahin 8million
Lars bender 12million
Cristico (potentially get him for cheap due to match fixing scandal, although he is not cleared yet) 7million
Ba 7million
Spend=95million including Podolski/Giroud
Income=69million
Net spend=26million
All the players would be attainable due to not playing/ non champions league clubs.
Surely a 26million expenditure should be expected for a top club, hopefully challenging for trophies.
dpt49 said:Not if the major shareholder is Stan Kroenke and his only ambition is to make a massive profit out of a "soccer" team :wink:Pea-Tear-Griffin said:Out:
RVP 25million
Walcott(potentially) 20million
Arshavin 7million
Park 3million
Bendtner 8million
Chamack 6million
Squillachi Released
In:
Jovetic 20million
Ben Arfa 18 million
Sahin 8million
Lars bender 12million
Cristico (potentially get him for cheap due to match fixing scandal, although he is not cleared yet) 7million
Ba 7million
Spend=95million including Podolski/Giroud
Income=69million
Net spend=26million
All the players would be attainable due to not playing/ non champions league clubs.
Surely a 26million expenditure should be expected for a top club, hopefully challenging for trophies.
dpt49 said:Not if the major shareholder is Stan Kroenke and his only ambition is to make a massive profit out of a "soccer" franchise :wink:Pea-Tear-Griffin said:Out:
RVP 25million
Walcott(potentially) 20million
Arshavin 7million
Park 3million
Bendtner 8million
Chamack 6million
Squillachi Released
In:
Jovetic 20million
Ben Arfa 18 million
Sahin 8million
Lars bender 12million
Cristico (potentially get him for cheap due to match fixing scandal, although he is not cleared yet) 7million
Ba 7million
Spend=95million including Podolski/Giroud
Income=69million
Net spend=26million
All the players would be attainable due to not playing/ non champions league clubs.
Surely a 26million expenditure should be expected for a top club, hopefully challenging for trophies.
AFC-Phil said:Granero has played more minutes as Mourinho looks at his deeper midfield roles in isolation. One as a DLP with Alonso playing and when Alonso required a break/was unavailable, Sahin stepped in. The other a B2B role with Khedira starting and at times Coentrao/Lass/Granero getting some game time.
Haven't checked the stats, but I'd be surprised if Mourinho started any La Liga/CL game with out one of Sahin/Alonso at the base of the midfield. I'd also wager that neither have successfully started together either.
THunter said:Ben Arfa and Tiote are better than Walcott and Song.jones said:We'd be a stronger side with Ba/Ben Arfa/Tiote in place of RVP/Walcott/Song? Really?
Plus because of their over-ratedness they're both ridiculously expensive. £20m for either? No chance of getting that from me when we already have Song, could get M'Vila for around £14m so Tiote's a no go.jones said:THunter said:Ben Arfa and Tiote are better than Walcott and Song.jones said:We'd be a stronger side with Ba/Ben Arfa/Tiote in place of RVP/Walcott/Song? Really?
Ben Arfa is clearly the better footballer, but he lacks end product. Also he's a liability because he's an idiot, a cancer in the dressing room and a crock, the guy's 25 and he has less games under his belt than Theo FFS. Don't know why people would want him here if we already have Diaby who ticks the same boxes and is not such a ****.
Tioté is vastly overrated to me, all muscle no brains. He seriously has nothing but his physique, no goal threat (except for the obligatory screamer against us) and can't spot a pass if his life depended on it. Would take Song with all his flaws over him every day of the week, not exactly a slouch in the physical department either and an infinitely better footballer.
jones said:AFC-Phil said:Granero has played more minutes as Mourinho looks at his deeper midfield roles in isolation. One as a DLP with Alonso playing and when Alonso required a break/was unavailable, Sahin stepped in. The other a B2B role with Khedira starting and at times Coentrao/Lass/Granero getting some game time.
Haven't checked the stats, but I'd be surprised if Mourinho started any La Liga/CL game with out one of Sahin/Alonso at the base of the midfield. I'd also wager that neither have successfully started together either.
No offence, but I'm seriously wondering which La Liga you did watch last season. Sahin had two or three sub cameos all season, most of the time he didn't even make the bench.
Not saying that Mourinho is looking to offload, but if you look at these stats:
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.transfermarkt.de/de/nuri-sahin/leistungsdaten/spieler_31095_2011.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.transfermarkt.de/de/nuri-sah ... _2011.html</a>" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
He played only in matches that had little to no meaning at all. Of course, it's not easy to get playing time if the competition for your spot is Xabi Alonso, but Benzema and Higuain find themselves in the same situation and they compete with each other, leaving Mourinho no choice but to play both. Sahin, for whatever reason, does not.
AFC-Phil said:Not sure why you've responded here. I've acknowledged that he was used sparingly, but explained why that was the case.
Haven't checked the stats, but I'd be surprised if Mourinho started any La Liga/CL game with out one of Sahin/Alonso at the base of the midfield.
jones said:Fair enough, I understood it differently and responded to this
Haven't checked the stats, but I'd be surprised if Mourinho started any La Liga/CL game with out one of Sahin/Alonso at the base of the midfield.
It's not down to who he rates, it's his perception of the roles and with Alonso playing to a high level and almost always available, Sahin hasn't got much of a look in, in such a specialist role.
jones said:I found it a little strange, to me it seems as if Sahin really played any part and filled in for Xabi, when it really wasn't the case.
Agree with the rest though, no doubt about his quality, and Real players tend to do bad in their first year, then come back strongly. Bad decision by Sahin nevertheless to move there imo.