Country: Iceland
2015 Hydro wouldn't believe it
Well at that time I didn't know we would end up with Lacazette.
2015 Hydro wouldn't believe it
Giroud is a better footballer, his finishing is where things let him down.Who's better for you, Lacazette or Giroud?
What's he better at, and did he ever put it to any use?Giroud is a better footballer, his finishing is where things let him down.
I bet Lacazette hates Emery as much as I do. Might have to reconsider my Lacazette hate. Dreadful football player. Amazing hater!
Giroud is a better footballer, his finishing is where things let him down.
Better than Laca with his back to goal, can hold the ball unlike now where we’re a turnover machine, stronger in the air, his flicks and knock downs are more effective than Laca and his link up play was better. Top target man - put it to use most of the time he was here.What's he better at, and did he ever put it to any use?
Better in the air for obvious reasons, knockdowns will come from that. Inferior everywhere else, for me. Better player by a fair bit.Better than Laca with his back to goal, can hold the ball unlike now where we’re a turnover machine, stronger in the air, his flicks and knock downs are more effective than Laca and his link up play was better. Top target man - put it to use most of the time he was here.
We wanted an Auba though rather than a big man, so he copped a fair bit of stick.
Only thing Lacazette has over him is abit of extra pace and slightly better finishing.
Nah, back to goal, holding the ball, flicks, bringing others into play etc, Giroud is by far superior.Better in the air for obvious reasons, knockdowns will come from that. Inferior everywhere else, for me. Better player by a fair bit.
Better in the air for obvious reasons, knockdowns will come from that. Inferior everywhere else, for me. Better player by a fair bit.
Why you putting Laca in there? What has he done to be in with strikers who have scored 40 goals a season for Arsenal?Auba, Laca or Ade...who would you say is the best?
Think of them all at their best for us.
Why you putting Laca in there? What has he done to be in with strikers who have scored 40 goals a season for Arsenal?
Based on what? Think Ade was the talented of the lot but was crazy, Auba has made a bigger impact and Giroud had the longevity.You and Jury were talking about Laca...throw Giroud in there to make it a foursome, how would you rank them?
Based on what? Think Ade was the talented of the lot but was crazy, Auba has made a bigger impact and Giroud had the longevity.
All things considered -
Auba
Ade
Giroud
Laca
Ade for that season was almost unplayable. Had he stayed as motivated as that for longer, he'd be preferred over Auba. At their best, it would depend who they were playing with. I think Ade would do better in this team and Auba would do better in the team Ade had his best season with.Auba, Laca or Ade...who would you say is the best?
Think of them all at their best for us.
Laca is a better footballer than Giroud, but a worse striker. He is much better technically than the donkey, but he has no striker instinct. Giroud on top of being a target man of sort was a decent poacher by the end despite his pace.
Actually on the pace front, our scouts must have gone out of their way to find the one striker that is slower than Giroud, but credit to them they managed it with Laca. Giroud looked like Usain Bolt in comparision to Laca during the EL final.