Jury
A-M's drunk uncle
As long as he's not trying to shield the back four or get involved in attack, he's not bad I suppose... which means he does what?
i disagree with the first part.. its when he tries to do both at the same time that he looks poorThe Jury said:As long as he's not trying to shield the back four or get involved in attack, he's not bad I suppose... which means he does what?
The Jury said:What do you know!
Song's now become Makelele after his 3 match ban. Brilliant. :mrgreen:
Truth be known, they're both ****.
USArsenal said:he's good when he does what he really SHOULD be doing, and that is sitting in front of the defence.. for me, he tries to be Zidane too much, gets caught out, and needs to make some ill-advised tackle trying to cover what he SHOULD have been covering
Diaby, on the other hand, is not a replacement for Song.. in truth, with everyone healthy, he doesnt get near a starting role
celestis said:The Jury said:What do you know!
Song's now become Makelele after his 3 match ban. Brilliant. :mrgreen:
Truth be known, they're both ****.
lol You think Song is **** ? who do you rate in the Arsenal midfield then ?
Dave_Ja_Vu said:I gave up on Diaby towards the end of 09/10. I challenge anyone who still believes Diaby is/will be a top player, to go watch 90 minute re-runs of Barca away, Wigan away, Blackburn away and Sp**s away from 09/10. Being injury prone I can forgive, being lazy and having almost zero intelligence in pressure situations, I can't forgive.
redwhiteAustrian said:I've still not given up on him.
Now that's an achievement.