Viper said:Its a shame they never improve the graphics engine. I also hate the commentry. Its a load of s**t.
Viper said:Its a shame they never improve the graphics engine. I also hate the commentry. Its a load of s**t.
goonerz49 said:will pro evo 6 have the real arsenal kits again like prov evo 5?
goonerz49 said:how did you get a chipped ps3?
Wrong. I still think the graphics of Pro Evo are rather ****e.LuKaZaN said:Viper said:Its a shame they never improve the graphics engine. I also hate the commentry. Its a load of s**t.
Nothing wrong with the graphics engine tbh, and I'd guess that in terms of graphics they are already at the PS2's hardware's limit. They made it any better and you'd probably be suffering in other areas of the game i.e content, load times, FPS (frames per second) etc.
goonerz49 said:anyone got a picture of the new arsenal kits on pes6? and how many teams have got the real kits now, how many english teams?
Viper said:Wrong. I still think the graphics of Pro Evo are rather s***e.LuKaZaN said:Viper said:Its a shame they never improve the graphics engine. I also hate the commentry. Its a load of s**t.
Nothing wrong with the graphics engine tbh, and I'd guess that in terms of graphics they are already at the PS2's hardware's limit. They made it any better and you'd probably be suffering in other areas of the game i.e content, load times, FPS (frames per second) etc.
I would say the graphics engine used for Fifa is better than the one used in Pro Evo. The crowd looks better, the shadows are better, the lighting is better etc. The player models look awful though, and thats where Pro Evo wins. I also like the Pro Evo anims more. The kits and faces in Fifa look s**t where as they look pretty decent in Pro Evo.
The graphics of Pro Evo are not set at the PS2's hardware limit. God of War pushes the PS2 to the limit. Gran Turismo 4 pushes the PS2 to the limit. MGS3 pushes the PS2 to its limit. Pro evo doesn't and I can't see why.
LuKaZaN said:Viper said:Wrong. I still think the graphics of Pro Evo are rather s***e.LuKaZaN said:Viper said:Its a shame they never improve the graphics engine. I also hate the commentry. Its a load of s**t.
Nothing wrong with the graphics engine tbh, and I'd guess that in terms of graphics they are already at the PS2's hardware's limit. They made it any better and you'd probably be suffering in other areas of the game i.e content, load times, FPS (frames per second) etc.
I would say the graphics engine used for Fifa is better than the one used in Pro Evo. The crowd looks better, the shadows are better, the lighting is better etc. The player models look awful though, and thats where Pro Evo wins. I also like the Pro Evo anims more. The kits and faces in Fifa look s**t where as they look pretty decent in Pro Evo.
The graphics of Pro Evo are not set at the PS2's hardware limit. God of War pushes the PS2 to the limit. Gran Turismo 4 pushes the PS2 to the limit. MGS3 pushes the PS2 to its limit. Pro evo doesn't and I can't see why.
Yep, and in those games mentioned you get awful slow down and FPS problems.. something that can be fairly well ignored in those types of games but for football type games it's a big no no.
Believe me, they are at the PS2's limit in terms of graphics. A football game is alot different to those MGS or God Of War type of games, for a start there is alot more going on on the screen at one time and it's alot for the PS2 to render. Fifa probably gets away with having better crowds and shadows because the player models look absolutely shocking and they are all the same height and weight. In PES every player has his own height, weight and physique style, the PS2 has a lot to cope with.
I'm a moderator on the official PES website, I have inside knowledge so trust me, the PS2 is at it's hardware limit.