nazo
Established Member
Anything below 10mil and i'll take him.
100% correct and if you look at the good clubs, they are all going towards midfielders who can press and harry (united with anderson and hargreaves, chelsea with ballack and essien) and it looks like rafa is realising this as well. teams with static midfielders just get pounced on. thats why pirlo is so overrated now, its why we utterly dominated milan's midfield. they looked like complete **** against us, and they were. juve did well to get poulsen instead of xabi alonso - cheaper and covers more ground.Gazza Martinez said:There's no doubting Xabi's virtues - range, strength, technique. However he doesn't cover alot of space, and isn't very active in midfield pressing like Flamini was. Arguably our midfield game would become more passive with a player who prefers to 'sit in' like Xabi. I wouldn't call him lazy, that'd be like calling Pirlo lazy. They operate in a certain area of the pitch. Personally I like us as a high pressing team, it allows us to win the ball higher up the pitch and break. If I had to choose I'd prefer Barry - Alonso's technique leaves him in the shade, but Barry's workrate, intensity, and mobility would be arguably more useful in our current midfield.
Yes. Which is why the enthusiasm for his tranfer to Arsenal is puzzling.banduan said:Isn't he another walking sicknote?
psycho said:Yes. Which is why the enthusiasm for his tranfer to Arsenal is puzzling.banduan said:Isn't he another walking sicknote?
For me he personifies everything we don't need at the moment.
kym7224 said:A source close to Alonso said: “If the decision was down to Xabi, he would make the move because Arsenal’s style is perfect for him.”
James said:He'll shoot with an open goal from 60 yards, as Newcastle and Luton found outJasard said:Does he shoot when faced with an open goal from 6 inches out or pass it back to Eboue? That is the ultimate test