Brentford was on the referee! Even the PGMOL admits that.Shame we didn't have enough against the bigguys from Everton and Brentford.
How that goal was allowed? Just beyond the pale. This cannot be incompetence, it has to be bias and wanting certain teams to be favoured or disadvantaged. Sp**s is one of the favoured teams. This isn't a free kick but Son gets a penalty for Cedric's contact on him... How this is allowed to go on year after year?
No, Gabriel's pull wasn't even VAR checked. If you watched the game you should have seen a VAR check for Newcastle. Look it up.I don't get your point? They're two different situations.
Saka's yesterday was minimal contact. Gabriel vs Newcastle was a blatant penalty that should have been given.
Bro I'm talking Burns falling down in our box and a VAR check was done.There was minimal contact for Saka penalty claim yesterday. I agree that was a soft claim and Saka certainly intentionally went down looking for a penalty.
Gabriel was a clear and obvious penalty as per Les Ferdinand and all the other pundits agreed it was a stone wall penalty. Burns from behind had the front of Gabriel shirt and pulling so much that the front shirt sponsor was actually behind Gabriel.
I thought that Trossard goal shouldn't of been disallowed and agree with the likes of Lineaker, OHara over Gray and keys on this incident. Minimal contact (white had a very loose grip, it wouldn't have prevented Ward from using his hand if chose to do so.
I don't mean that ridiculous mistake by VAR officials but that we didn't actually deserve more than one point from our play.Brentford was on the referee! Even the PGMOL admits that.
It happened with Arsenal against Villa this season already - Ramsdale's arm was held in the Douglas Luiz corner that went straight in. VAR didn't overrule.Next time it happens to Ramsdale on a corner where opposition players are purposely blocking/holding onto him to stop him getting to the ball, I will be waiting with baited breath to see if VAR bother to look at it or if these decisions only ever seem to go against Arsenal.
For what it’s worth, the right decision was taken to not award the goal. If the roles were reversed however, no way do VAR get involved. Arsenal going 1-0 down would have been the story and another way to kick us.
What does "deserving" a win has to do with anything here?I don't mean that ridiculous mistake by VAR officials but that we didn't actually deserve more than one point from our play.
I was surprised that they deserved a lead so much more than us in the first half.
Villa and Leicester were two very deserved wins in my book.
Brentford wouldn't have been..
You constructed a dumb strawman rather than actually engaging with what I said, I never said that was the biggest part of football. As far as worth discussing, who are you and why do I care what you whether you want to discuss anything with me? You're not relevant to me in any way.Xhaka freaking battles in midfield. Yes, he doesn’t offer as much as Saka in the final third, but if you think that’s the biggest part of football then it’s not even worth discussing it with you.
You constructed a dumb strawman rather than actually engaging with what I said, I never said that was the biggest part of football. As far as worth discussing, who are you and why do I care what you whether you want to discuss anything with me? You're not relevant to me in any way.
It happened with Arsenal against Villa this season already - Ramsdale's arm was held in the Douglas Luiz corner that went straight in. VAR didn't overrule.