Player:Saliba
It was reported last week that they are willing to offer Correa, Lemar or Vitolo in a swap deal.
Yeah that just seems to amateur to be true. Who knows I guess
It was reported last week that they are willing to offer Correa, Lemar or Vitolo in a swap deal.
Atletico can only spend 25 percent of what they make in sales. So its a no brainer for them to swap Lacazette and say 15M for Partey.
We were linked with Patson Daka a few weeks back, right?
#SellLacaSignDaka
He scored 24 goals in 31 games last season too which is the sort of numbers Haaland was getting there.
Can someone please explain how this 25% of sales makes sense? It just seems such a random and pointless criteria to stick to. It literally can be 25% of £0 to £100m+, how can you plan around that?
I do understand if a club needs to make sales to balance the books or needs to recoup a certain amount of money but in that case they will have an amount of money in a certain range in mind. Maybe I'm missing something obvious but to me implementing a rule where you keep 75% of all player sales doesn't serve any purpose. The income from that varies so hugely that it renders it meaningless.
So they’ll only take him if we agree to take their trash? Yeah, so not really interested.It was reported last week that they are willing to offer Correa, Lemar or Vitolo in a swap deal.
It's funny how they're desperate to offer a swap for Laca, but won't even consider one for Partey.So they’ll only take him if we agree to that their trash? Yeah, so not really interested.
Maybe because they want to use the Partey money on a CM.It's funny how they're desperate to offer a swap for Laca, but won't even consider one for Partey.
£25m + Laca or whatever the offer was is not terrible since Marc Roca's fee is only around €30m.Maybe because they want to use the Partey money on a CM.
Then why can't they take Douzy?Maybe because they want to use the Partey money on a CM.
Because he’s very raw. I’ll say he needs 2-4 years of development to become a top player, some managers need immediate performances. Or he’s the wrong profile and Diego wants a different type.Then why can't they take Douzy?
Yeah on paper, looks a terrible deal.Would people really swap Laca and cash for Partey now we’ve got Ceballos back?
Doesn’t look like a good deal to me.
Partey over Ceballos is an improvement at CM, but the price is extravagant and (a) we’d still be lacking creativity in midfield, while (b) we would then be short up front too.
Would much rather we use our funds on a creative midfielder if that’s the cost of acquiring Partey.
Yeah on paper, looks a terrible deal.
Atletico can only spend 25 percent of what they make in sales. So its a no brainer for them to swap Lacazette and say 15M for Partey.
Even a Lacazette and Guendouzi swap for Partey would be elite business for both clubs.
Would still get both Partey and Aouar as quick as we can if Arteta want to play 4-3-3 long term you need Partey because ceballos xhaka will get bypassed we saw that against Watford was too easy for them.Would people really swap Laca and cash for Partey now we’ve got Ceballos back?
Doesn’t look like a good deal to me.
Partey over Ceballos is an improvement at CM, but the price is extravagant and (a) we’d still be lacking creativity in midfield, while (b) we would then be short up front too.
Would much rather we use our funds on a creative midfielder if that’s the cost of acquiring Partey.
Would people really swap Laca and cash for Partey now we’ve got Ceballos back?
Doesn’t look like a good deal to me.
Partey over Ceballos is an improvement at CM, but the price is extravagant and (a) we’d still be lacking creativity in midfield, while (b) we would then be short up front too.
Would much rather we use our funds on a creative midfielder if that’s the cost of acquiring Partey.