dionysius
Active Member
Good. We shouldn't be going for another 18 year old who'd be on the fringes of the first team. We just have too many of those. I'm happy that he'll be developing at Lille. He won't get as much games with Arsenal right now.
So a guy that mainly makes substitute appearances for Lille in Ligue 1 would walk right into our starting 11?DaGunners said:How am I overrating him? Hazard can actually take on players effectively with BOTH pace and trickery/flair. Walcott definitely can't do the trickery part, and Nasri doesn't have the balls to take on players full stop.
Do you rate Arshavin highly?Viking said:If he were that good he would've been purchased by a big club a long time ago.
Usually on Saturdays/Sundays :wink:Raider said:When do you watch him play Dag?
DaGunners said:Do you rate Arshavin highly?Viking said:If he were that good he would've been purchased by a big club a long time ago.
Now, if you haven't seen him play, please stop talking like you know what the kid is about.
I've seen a lot of him and it's clear that you're overrating him. The way you talk he sounds like the second coming of Zidane. He didn't even get into the team of the season in France. Good prospect but not close to either Theo or Nasri yet. Especially not Theo. Really, the distance is a mile wide between them. Theo scored a hattrick for England against Croatia while Hazard isn't even a regular for Belgium yet. Also, I think Wilshere will be a better player than Hazard at the time he might be ready to do a job here. He's a fancy player to look at when things are going his way but he's not nearly developed enough to play regularly for us.DaGunners said:Yes he would. He is better than Nasri and is better now as a winger than Theo will ever be. Seriously, you need to understand how good he is, and how good he will become at a bigger club. Imagine a less selfish Ronaldo.