- Thread starter
- #241
read he is a relative of Myles Palmer so legit & linked upWho's this " JoeTheGooner " guy? Never heard of him until recently.
I suspect he just looks up who people seem to want on A-M and slap the name onto his Twitter. According to his tweets we're apparently interested in Aarons, Doig, Bissouma, Berge, Camavinga, Buendia, Aouar, Grealish, Olise, Toney, but not interested in Brandt. How convenient.Who's this " JoeTheGooner " guy? Never heard of him until recently.
I'm not saying Azeez would play the kind of minutes Cesc did at that age, I just don't want to block the path to first team action for our youth by signing other young players. I rate Camavinga highly, but he's only going to stay with us for a couple of years til Madrid come calling again. Sure, we'll make a tidy profit (hopefully) but our youngsters will lose out on a lot of development. And that's assuming Tets doesn't screw him up.
Maybe Azeez isn't ready yet, but Saka didn't really light up youth football, he's just shown how determined he is. And our young players have accomplished far more than our so-called senior players this year, so why not give some more at least the opportunity to shine?
Azeez at 18 is not even standout player at Arsenal u23 and can’t get near the worst Arsenal team in 25 years. Camavinga at 18 is international at the best national team in the world and has every top team interested. This is Arsenal fans in nutshell loool. So embarrassingI'm not saying Azeez would play the kind of minutes Cesc did at that age, I just don't want to block the path to first team action for our youth by signing other young players. I rate Camavinga highly, but he's only going to stay with us for a couple of years til Madrid come calling again. Sure, we'll make a tidy profit (hopefully) but our youngsters will lose out on a lot of development. And that's assuming Tets doesn't screw him up.
Maybe Azeez isn't ready yet, but Saka didn't really light up youth football, he's just shown how determined he is. And our young players have accomplished far more than our so-called senior players this year, so why not give some more at least the opportunity to shine?
Not being funny but our entire u23 team has been very disappointing this year so it's a bit hard to blame an 18 year old for not being consistent enough. He probably does need at least a year or two on loan before he's ready to step up, but I find it hard to believe anyone could play worse than Ceballos has this year, and he still gets minutes.Azeez at 18 is not even standout player at Arsenal u23 and can’t get near the worst Arsenal team in 25 years. Camavinga at 18 is international at the best national team in the world and has every top team interested. This is Arsenal fans in nutshell loool. So embarrassing
The u23 are mainly 18 and 19 year olds and both him and Balugon who people big up here have kids same age as them doing way better in that leagueNot being funny but our entire u23 team has been very disappointing this year so it's a bit hard to blame an 18 year old for not being consistent enough. He probably does need at least a year or two on loan before he's ready to step up, but I find it hard to believe anyone could play worse than Ceballos has this year, and he still gets minutes.
Like @wolfkidultman said, if he's good enough he should still make it for us.
I don't see anything embarrassing about wanting to see our youth players succeed considering we are talking about £80m for a young player still developing and we have other pressing needs too. The only embarrassing thing I see is your need to have an argument about it.
We should have just signed Bellingham. I don't see why Canavinga doesn't stay put for a year and move to a giant.
I think if a quality young player with great upside is interested, you go for him. To me it's a youngster like Camavinga plus someone like Bentancur or Grealish, rather than Camavinga plus Buendia, for instance, just in terms of the right age balance.I don't think Rennes would want to lose their gem for nothing, they deserve to get a good fee for him.
I think stylistically he'd work fantastic here. But something I heard someone say is that we're already a very young team, and what we actually need is a couple of players aged 24-26 to come in and perform straight away. In that sense Camavinga might not be a perfect fit.
well, there less than 2 years difference in total between the three of them. Bentancur is the youngest as wellI think if a quality young player with great upside is interested, you go for him. To me it's a youngster like Camavinga plus someone like Bentancur or Grealish, rather than Camavinga plus Buendia, for instance, just in terms of the right age balance.