How my times do you think Reiss and his agent mentioned the Bournemouth goal during the contract talks
Delighted for him, tbh!
Probably had one of those huge posters American politicians love to have behind them during congressional hearings.
How my times do you think Reiss and his agent mentioned the Bournemouth goal during the contract talks
Delighted for him, tbh!
Indeed, he has the talent and how many late bloomers have we seen who spent season after season on loan in different countries when they were young.I wanted us to keep him, so I'm glad we did, I thought he was as good as gone.
Really won me over this season. Prior to this season I had no faith in his prospects of making it here, because I had never seen the directness and explosiveness required for him to take that step. I don't know whether it's his training regimen, or a change in mentality after his stint at Feyenoord, or both, but he actually brought those qualities to the table this season and was always a positive whenever he came on as a sub.
He might just be a late bloomer.
Aside from his pace, there's really nothing to suggest he'd be able to cut it there. Having defensive awareness as an attacker is completely different than as a defender, positioning, duels and heading ability come into play when you're a defender. You'd be better off using Partey or something if you were really that desperate.Wondered whether to add here or on the transfer thread, decided here even though transfer thread seems focused on signing a replacement right-back.
Could Reiss play as an emergency rb if needed there? Can you see it being a big coaching job to have him play that role? Saka can play full-back and Reiss is deemed to have defensive awareness so could this be an emergency option if called upon?
Wondered whether to add here or on the transfer thread, decided here even though transfer thread seems focused on signing a replacement right-back.
Could Reiss play as an emergency rb if needed there? Can you see it being a big coaching job to have him play that role? Saka can play full-back and Reiss is deemed to have defensive awareness so could this be an emergency option if called upon?
Reiss is very much an attacker and unless you're playing another type of modified role for him, I don't think it's close to the best way to use him. The best way to use Reiss IMO is in a role that allows him to move inside and dribble or combine with the other attackers and on-rushing midfielders. While he's very capable playing very wide, Reiss' best work is usually always inside and when he's heavily involved. If he plays on the fringes of the game, he's not as impactful.Wondered whether to add here or on the transfer thread, decided here even though transfer thread seems focused on signing a replacement right-back.
Could Reiss play as an emergency rb if needed there? Can you see it being a big coaching job to have him play that role? Saka can play full-back and Reiss is deemed to have defensive awareness so could this be an emergency option if called upon?
Yes, but imagine you go out and find a replacement. You've got no transfer fee to mitigate the cost of replacing him, you're then paying far north of £5m in transfer fees, then you have the obligatory signing-on fee and weekly wages plus bonuses.So according to what I've found on the web; currently we have
- Ødegaard on 110-120k/week depending on the source, waiting for his new contract
- Xhaka is on 120k/week
- Trossard is on 90K/week.
I don't know in what world you pay more Nelson than Trossard for instance. I find it crazy.
This kind of wages are closing a door to a move out of the PL if things don't work out. There isn't a single club in Europe who can afford to give more than £5M/year on an injury prone player who didn't do much in his career yet.
The other major risk is to drive prices up in our wage bill.
For instance, if you're Tomiyasu and currently earning 50-60K/week, you'd be crazy to ask for less than 110-120k/week in the next contract if Nelson is getting 100k.
Giving huge contracts to mediocre player is what got us in a terrible situation in the first place. Why are we doing the same today?
I have no issue if we "overpay" our young stars, like Saka Saliba Martinelli.
But to give big money to a squaddie, naaaah, I don't like it.
Yes, but imagine you go out and find a replacement. You've got no transfer fee to mitigate the cost of replacing him, you're then paying far north of £5m in transfer fees, then you have the obligatory signing-on fee and weekly wages plus bonuses.
Even if Nelson has incentive bonuses, he would have to play to earn them, so he wouldn't cost any more than the value of the contract based on how often Arteta used him last season.
Give the lad a chance. Jeeesus.
Sure, but as has already been mentioned, there is a premium attached to having no transfer fee and being home grown.I'm giving a chance, I'm not doubting his abilities.
But from a business perspective it is a very risky move. One that cost us a lot in the past where we couldn't shift our squad players because they were earning simply too much.
We're giving a huge contract to a player who failed to stay fit during his whole career at Arsenal, and last season played less than 600 min in all competitions.
And this contract also sets a precedent. How much are gonna ask our other squad players when it's gonna be time to negotiate when they see a team mate making that kind of money?
At the end of the day i hope this deal is gonna work well for all the parties and hope that nelson will be worth it, but it was so hard to trim the wage bill that i feel like we're taking unnecessary risk with this kind of contract.
Remember how it was first rumoured that Saka gets 300k per week? But then that it's 200k per week base wage. If it's similar, Nelson's base wage would be 66k per week.The reported salary that Reiss will be getting is outrageous for a guy who's barely a back up; and I rate Reiss highly. We have limited resources, we can't be spunking those types of wages on back ups - it also makes him harder to sell if for whatever reason it doesn't work out next year.
10 million? Nelson is not all that and it would be absolutely waste to extend him based on couple of good subs. 12 months ago he was struggling in the Dutch leagueRemember how it was first rumoured that Saka gets 300k per week? But then that it's 200k per week base wage. If it's similar, Nelson's base wage would be 66k per week.
If you buy a player of Nelson's talent level, how much would it cost compared to Nelson's total cost?
10 million? Nelson is not all that and it would be absolutely waste to extend him based on couple of good subs. 12 months ago he was struggling in the Dutch league
Put Liverpool in our place and they'd be reporting Nelson is paying them so he's allowed to stay at the club.The base wage is never 100k but journalists love to report wrong wages.
People don’t rate him. It will just be another nketiah situation tbhNo he wasn’t
Was a very slow start but he left a key player. Besides the point anyways, who even knows if the reports regarding his salary are accurate.
Look how confused and outraged people are, the article done it’s job.