Love to see people labelling strikers they don't like as the "(insert nationality) Walcott".
Like, a good chap yeah. As a fotballer?I've used it to praise two strikers we signed. Lacazette and Auba. I always liked Walcott!
Mhm offering Jenkinson to sweeten the deal? Player on 45k a week with 1 year on his contract.......real sweetner. No wonder the sun doesnt credit a "journalist"
Mhm offering Jenkinson to sweeten the deal? Player on 45k a week with 1 year on his contract.......real sweetner. No wonder the sun doesnt credit a "journalist"
Mentioning trading Nelson is excellent click bait for Arsenal fans.
Surprised they didn't put Welbeck or Ramsey.You don't think they'd want Jenkinson to battle Wan-Bissaka for the starting right back job?
You know, I've often thought of trying my hand at fiction. Maybe I should apply for a job at the Sun. I could certainly make up more believable rumors than Jenkinson for a club that has Wan-Bissaka.
:rofl:
Surprised they didn't put Welbeck or Ramsey.
Honestly interested in your opinion of the sun, is it where journalists go to die? I feel like 80% of this forum is more well informed.Maybe Palace would like Ian Wright back.
More like 40+ if teams like United are sniffing around.They’ll want 30-40M for Bissaka, never mind Zaha.
Honestly interested in your opinion of the sun, is it where journalists go to die? I feel like 80% of this forum is more well informed.
Yeah Murdoch run news plus all tabloids might as well be fictional (i liked to call tabloids the beano for adults). Trying to think of trust worthy newspapers...The Times and The Guardian? I know they both have proper journalists.One of my heroes of journalism was a Chicago newspaper columnist named Mike Royko. He worked for the Chicago Sun-Times, but quit the paper to work for the rival Chicago Tribune after Rupert Murdoch bought the Sun-Times in 1984 (thankfully Murdoch only owned it for two years). When Royko quit, he said "No self-respecting fish would want to be wrapped in a Murdoch paper." Murdoch has owned The Sun since 1969.
Yeah Murdoch run news plus all tabloids might as well be fictional (i liked to call tabloids the beano for adults). Trying to think of trust worthy newspapers...The Times and The Guardian? I know they both have proper journalists.
I think we're reasonably good here (this forum) in discounting all redtops. (might as as well be quoting indy kaila) There are enough of us that know credible sources which is niceI check The Guardian just about every day for news (scanning their live feeds are a great way to catch up quickly). I don't see The Times much (if I'm not mistaken it's behind a paywall), but The Independent seems pretty good as well.
Of course football transfer coverage in the U.K. (especially among the tabloids) is something I hardly recognize as journalism. These unsourced rumors being promoted as "news" is something you rarely see in the United States. I would be ashamed to put my name to most of this stuff.
Here in the states, most newspapers still do a good job of covering news and sports accurately and fairly. They don't always get it right, but it's not the kind of mess you see on cable news or in the British tabloids (or Murdoch papers like the New York Post). But a lot of people confuse editorial content (columnists, op-eds and editorials) with news coverage, so they get confused because they're used to it all blending together like on TV. But even Murdoch's New York Post could not possibly get away with some of the crap that spews from The Sun.