A.Madrid not signing Vlahovic. They going for Cunha instead.
-
! ! ! IMPORTANT MESSAGE ! ! !
Discussions about police investigations
In light of recent developments about a player from Premier League being arrested and until there is an official announcement, ALL users should refrain from discussing or speculating about situations around personal off-pitch matters related to any Arsenal player. This is to protect you and the forum.
Users who disregard this reminder will be issued warnings and their posts will get deleted from public.
Dušan Vlahović
- Thread starter HairSprayGooners
- Start date
- Replies 3,381
- Views 254,920
- Status
A.Madrid not signing Vlahovic. They going for Cunha instead.
The reasons not signing him according to di marzio is the price set by Fiorentina they want 60m euros and A.Madrid didn't feel he value that
Rasmi
Negative Nancy
Country: England
Arteta loves crosses in the box, but he prefers to have 1 player who is not good in the air there. It’s too basic to have player great in the air with crosses. Arteta loves to think outside the box and have laca in there instead
seriously though I been saying all summer Chris wood would be great for us
- Thread starter
- #204
HairSprayGooners
My brother posted it ⏩
Nice. At least there's an option there for us.
The price is bit high and i agree about A.Madrid not pay it very high risk. Sp**s are still interested but depends on Kane
- Thread starter
- #206
HairSprayGooners
My brother posted it ⏩
We don't have anyone that's good in the air, that's the problem.
- Thread starter
- #208
HairSprayGooners
My brother posted it ⏩
Considering price and style Vlahovic suits us so perfectly.
Another huge bonus to Vlahovic is that he wouldn't have to be registered as he's deemed as an U21 player.
Hes also on £28k per week with Fiorentina meaning he wouldn't add much to the wage bill.
Another huge bonus to Vlahovic is that he wouldn't have to be registered as he's deemed as an U21 player.
Hes also on £28k per week with Fiorentina meaning he wouldn't add much to the wage bill.
Sammy1887
New Year, Same Hate For Reed
Think Tottenham will get him once/if Kane signs for City.
No don’t worry we will still pay him an eye watering amount considering he’d be a big money transfer and our wage structure is crap.
Rasmi
Negative Nancy
Country: England
It’s not a problem for Arteta. It’s what he wants. Crosses to players not good in the air
NieThePiet
Loves Overhyping Our Rivals
Cunha under Simeone? No way 
StefanB
Active Member
Seems like a good prospect. But €60M for a 21 year old striker from Serie A who has had 1 outstanding season so far in his career?
No way are we going to bid for this guy.
No way are we going to bid for this guy.
That's what putting team off look like nobody going over 50m for him
Ash10
Chairman of the Bum Brigade
We did bid 72m for a 23 year old winger from ligue 1 who had one great season so far in his career
StefanB
Active Member
Seems like we learned our lesson then.
Leo_ense_
AnthonyG Survivor
He’s also completely unproven but sure let’s sign him for 60m and hope for the best.
How many of his games have you actually watched ffs? Embarrassing fan base.
Got one 30 goal a season striker and one 20 goal striker already at the club but getting wet for some raw kid instead. What blind faith do you have that this ****e management and training method could even bring this striker up to a reasonable output level for our ambitions? None, none whatsoever.
Country: England
Only news is he's not off to Atletico. Kane hasn't travelled for the game today. Can see Sp**s making a strong move this week.
Country: Wales
Who we getting as striker now that Tammy’s gone bro?
- Status
