freeglennhelder2
Established Member
Country: England
Player:Elneny
any player who wants to go to Newcastle now for bigger pay checks is welcome to leave, as far as I'm concernedWant to bet they will do like City did and target Arsenal's players first? Lol
I think they're even worse option than Qatar. The genocide they have done in Jemen is atrocious stuff.It's a shame they decided to buy Newcastle instead of Arsena
What was Qatar's genocide? Have you read about Jemen?As opposed to the nicer genocides elsewhere?
I have read about Yemen. No idea about Qatar, but there are those who accuse them of being responsible for thousands of deaths in the construction of the world cup stadiums alone. Russia (and Soviet Union) is responsible for millions of deaths and no-one bats an eyelid about Chelsea being owned by Abramovich. The US foreign policy has also caused untold numbers of deaths, yet there are several US owners of premiership clubsWhat was Qatar's genocide? Have you read about Jemen?
I'm not comparing to any other country now, if you can understand that.
I have read about Yemen. No idea about Qatar, but there are those who accuse them of being responsible for thousands of deaths in the construction of the world cup stadiums alone. Russia (and Soviet Union) is responsible for millions of deaths and no-one bats an eyelid about Chelsea being owned by Abramovich. The US foreign policy has also caused untold numbers of deaths, yet there are several US owners of premiership clubs
My point was that a genocide, by definition, is always going to be atrocious. Otherwise it wouldn't be a genocide.
95% of the fans were sucking Neville's speech on Sky getting goosebumps on their skin, went straight to the protests after it or they were all over the internet "saving football". The number of idiots out there is surrealI don't know why you fans accept these takeovers to occur but then go and protest super league in your thousands. Both long term damage the state of football.
There is no logic in mentioning state owned clubs with clubs owned by private persons etc.I have read about Yemen. No idea about Qatar, but there are those who accuse them of being responsible for thousands of deaths in the construction of the world cup stadiums alone. Russia (and Soviet Union) is responsible for millions of deaths and no-one bats an eyelid about Chelsea being owned by Abramovich. The US foreign policy has also caused untold numbers of deaths, yet there are several US owners of premiership clubs
My point was that a genocide, by definition, is always going to be atrocious. Otherwise it wouldn't be a genocide.
Umm, what? We should go protest Newcastle's new owners, like that would do anything, or otherwise be that much of our business?I don't know why you fans accept these takeovers to occur but then go and protest super league in your thousands. Both long term damage the state of football.