I was actually agreeing with OO. May have phrased it poorly.I think asking if he can play CM long term is a fair question, like A__G said we donāt really know what he is saying until he has an extended run there.
I'm not huge on him (I just don't notice him and don't watch Ukraine) but fwiw I also think he can do it.I was actually agreeing with OO. May have phrased it poorly.
I think asking if he can play CM long term is a fair question, like A__G said we donāt really know what he is saying until he has an extended run there.
Compared to realistic specialist options like Neves and Tielemens who have done it for club and country, there is a slight risk with Zinny which you trade off for utility.
Thereās enough to suggest heās capable though, thatās not something Iād argue all day about.
Send that crystal ball over when youāre done with it yeah
Nothing youāve said screams better than Xhaka aka good enough to start for me.
95% on board, was gonna post something similar. Would still keep Xhaka though.
Could provide rotation for the first choice in a double pivot with Elneny, if Partey breaks down again. Would also be able to drop into the left channel to cover for the left wingback, as Xhaka does. A solid signing this, I really hope we get him over the line.
I would add someone like Aouar for that reported price of 13m. However that would probably put Smith-Rowe's midfield shift to bed, so cant see it happening really.
Wishlisty me says... Zinchenko, Tielemans, Auoar to come in. Midfield of Partey, Xhaka, Ćdegaard, Zinchenko, Tielemans, Auoar, Elneny. With Smith-Rowe, Lokonga, Patino for the future.
You know we have to make money sooner rather than later. We havenāt probably sold a player since Willock to Newcastle.People are in such a rush to get rid of Xhaka when heās the exact type of quality depth that teams like City, Liverpool and Chelsea will have.
Lock?
Put Xhaka's future in significant doubt then ****
Lock?
Gunnerblog said on Arsecast exactly that as his opinion and not based on anything. He just said something like "I can't imagine we'd get him because it would require the kind of money you spend on a starter". Have they written an article based on that opinion or have they grabbed that from Arsecast and associated it to the athletic?
Lock?
Gunnerblog said on Arsecast exactly that as his opinion and not based on anything. He just said something like "I can't imagine we'd get him because it would require the kind of money you spend on a starter". Have they written an article based on that opinion or have they grabbed that from Arsecast and associated it to the athletic?
Lock?