Nunowoolmez
Established Member
Say what now ?Yeah but Neto’s intrinsic skill level and potential are logarithmically weaker than my boy. Don’t hate. Appreciate.
Say what now ?Yeah but Neto’s intrinsic skill level and potential are logarithmically weaker than my boy. Don’t hate. Appreciate.
I didn't want Neto because of his injury-record and after he renewed his contract, knowing how much Wolves would ask.Yeah but Neto’s intrinsic skill level and potential are logarithmically weaker than my boy. Don’t hate. Appreciate.
Christian Renald from Manchester United. SEWY!People keep saying for that price they want established players. What established player from top teams can we buy in January?
Lol. Little bug bear of mine. Everyone knows if you want to take an off the charts number (like mudryks talent) and shrink it down to compare to a very much on the charts number (Neto’s talent) you take the logarithm.Say what now ?
Last thing I want is to give Piers Morgan a hard onChristian Renald from Manchester United. SEWY!
Ok, I'm not sure everyone does know that, but I'll take your word for it man.Lol. Little bug bear of mine. Everyone knows if you want to take an off the charts number (like mudryks talent) and shrink it down to compare to a very much on the charts number (Neto’s talent) you take the logarithm.
But people always say exponentially. Why?!? It’s infuriating. Exponentially stronger - sure. But logarithmically weaker my friend
Generation ****ed up...
I’m convinced now. Sign him up
I found information that it was 26 million pounds, not 30. Like I said, I can understand 40 million pounds, but more than that is pretty crazy for a player with his experience.
If more, it has to have some big clauses etc. in the fee, because of the risks involved.
We don't know the structure of that 26 million bid either, and it might be part of why it was rejected. But of course they knew his value will go up with UCL and his talent.
Ferran Torres when year younger (not sure about his contract length), went for 33,5 million euros to City, having played 3400 minutes in LaLiga (2nd toughest league in the world) plus 500 minutes in UCL and 250 minutes in UEL. I'd rate Mudryk's ceiling higher, but here you can see that that current rumour (not likely very trustworthy) is double that with less and much worse experience.Bare in mind the level of experience Mbappe had when he went for 150m, Antony when he went for 100m, Ferran Torres when he went for 55m. I'd also rather have someone UCL proven than someone that's only proven in Bundisliga or Ligue 1.
This is the fastest player in the UCL and if the biggest clubs in the world aren't in for him now, they will be in 6-12 . If we get him for less than 60m, it's a snip with immense upside.
He looks much better player than Gapko. Mudryks goal vs Ajax shows how devastating he can be and Gapko can never score a goal like thatWhen thinking about the alternatives, I think Mudryk would fit the team very well. Likely can play LW or RW as he looks pretty two-footed. Can score goals and looks very talented. Even with his little experience, I would rather buy him than Gakpo for example, because it looks like a much better fit. Gakpo isn't a good fit as RW rotation.
If Gakpo is 40 million euros, I think I can understand paying 50-60 million euros for Mudryk, if the deal has clear clauses to lessen the risks.
Ferran Torres when year younger (not sure about his contract length), went for 33,5 million euros to City, having played 3400 minutes in LaLiga (2nd toughest league in the world) plus 500 minutes in UCL and 250 minutes in UEL. I'd rate Mudryk's ceiling higher, but here you can see that that current rumour (not likely very trustworthy) is double that with less and much worse experience.
Mbappe had more experience, winner of Ligue 1 in an important role and his team went far in UCL. Antony a bit similar in a worse league, and is a Brazil international.
If Arsenal is willing to go 60-80 million euros (January window makes fees higher), my point is that it has to be somehow heavily claused fee, so that if he won't be a world beater, it won't be a Pepe situation and the final fee will stay lower. Like I said, I have never heard these kind of sums spent on a player with this kind of experience from a true farmer's league.
Good luck with that, not happening.
They said that before when their guy mentioned Anthony's fee from Ajax.
Yeah, like I said I would rather go for him than the other alternatives I know of. Those you mention and Gakpo for example.His fee will represent his market value though and not what mitigates risk to Arsenal. We've got to offer the type of fee that the biggest clubs in for him are willing to offer. For me 60million is low considering what other top prospects go for. His pace alone puts him in Mbappe, Henry, Bale, Walcott territory. And he looks like he has technique and close control to go with it. For me it's so much more exciting than the slow wingers we've been linked to like Neto, Torres and Pino.
You are obsessed with experience. Real paid 45 million euros for 16 year old Vinicius and 45 million for Rodrygo. Several clubs are ready to pay 60 million for 16 year old Endrick. Clubs buy talent and will spend on how they see that potentialFerran Torres when year younger (not sure about his contract length), went for 33,5 million euros to City, having played 3400 minutes in LaLiga (2nd toughest league in the world) plus 500 minutes in UCL and 250 minutes in UEL. I'd rate Mudryk's ceiling higher, but here you can see that that current rumour (not likely very trustworthy) is double that with less and much worse experience.
Mbappe had more experience, winner of Ligue 1 in an important role and his team went far in UCL. Antony a bit similar in a worse league, and is a Brazil international.
If Arsenal is willing to go 60-80 million euros (January window makes fees higher), my point is that it has to be somehow heavily claused fee, so that if he won't be a world beater, it won't be a Pepe situation and the final fee will stay lower. Like I said, I have never heard these kind of sums spent on a player with this kind of experience from a true farmer's league.